Cardiovascular

Prediction of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Machine Learning Approach.

TL;DR

A machine learning model trained on 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction showed high discrimination for new-onset atrial fibrillation (accuracy 97.0%, ROC-AUC 0.991), with echocardiographic, oxidative stress, NT-proBNP and revascularization variables as the top predictors, pending validation in larger multicenter cohorts.

Key Findings

The machine learning model achieved very high predictive performance for new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after acute myocardial infarction in the independent test set.

  • Accuracy was 97.0% in the independent test set.
  • ROC-AUC was 0.991.
  • Precision-recall AUC was 0.991.
  • The model was developed from a prospective cohort of 150 patients admitted within 24 h of symptom onset.

SHAP and permutation importance analyses identified a set of echocardiographic, biochemical, and procedural variables as the most influential predictors of new-onset AF.

  • Top predictors were the E/e' ratio, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrial volume index.
  • Oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase) were among the most influential predictors.
  • NT-proBNP and complete revascularization were also among the most influential predictors.
  • SHAP was used to identify and quantify the contribution of individual predictors.

The study combined clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data in a prospective cohort to build the prediction model.

  • 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction were enrolled, admitted within 24 h of symptom onset.
  • Performance was evaluated using ROC-AUC.
  • SHAP explainability was applied to quantify individual predictor contributions.

The authors conclude that machine learning with SHAP explainability shows high potential for predicting new-onset AF after acute myocardial infarction, but requires validation in larger multicenter cohorts.

  • The approach may improve individualized risk assessment and clinical decision-making.
  • Validation in larger multicenter cohorts is stated as pending.

What This Means

This study looked at whether a computer-based prediction method (machine learning) could identify which heart attack patients would go on to develop atrial fibrillation, an irregular heart rhythm that is linked to higher risk of death, heart failure, and further cardiovascular events. The researchers followed 150 patients who arrived at hospital within 24 hours of heart attack symptoms and collected clinical, blood, ECG, and heart ultrasound data. The model predicted new atrial fibrillation very accurately on a separate test set (97% accuracy, ROC-AUC 0.991). The factors that mattered most included measures of heart stiffness and structure on ultrasound (E/e' ratio, left ventricular mass, ejection fraction, left atrial volume), markers of oxidative stress in the blood, NT-proBNP (a heart strain marker), and whether blood flow was completely restored to the heart. This research suggests such models could eventually help doctors identify higher-risk patients early and tailor monitoring. However, the study was small (150 patients) and the authors themselves note the findings need to be validated in larger, multicenter groups before the approach can be relied on in practice.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Chiriliuc N, Corlateanu A, Arnaut O, Esanu I, David L, Bursacovschi D. (2026). Prediction of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Machine Learning Approach.. Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14060626