Predictive Value of Traditional and Novel Obesity Indices for Stroke and Its Subtypes Across Sexes and Glucose Status: Toward Precision Prevention Strategies.
Li F, Wang Z, et al. • Journal of the American Heart Association • 2026
Weight-adjusted waist index exceeds conventional obesity metrics in predicting cerebrovascular events, with robust performance across sexes and glucose-regulated populations, supporting sex-specific adiposity assessment in stroke prevention particularly for ischemic subtypes in normoglycemic individuals.
Key Findings
Results
Novel obesity indices outperformed traditional metrics (BMI, waist circumference) for predicting total and ischemic stroke.
Eight novel indices were compared: weight-adjusted waist index, a body shape index, body roundness index, visceral adiposity index, conicity index, lipid accumulation product, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio.
Traditional measures compared were body mass index and waist circumference.
Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to generate hazard ratios with 95% CIs.
Predictive discrimination was assessed via Harrell's C-statistic.
The study analyzed 398,270 stroke-free UK Biobank participants in a retrospective cohort design.
Results
Weight-adjusted waist index showed the strongest associations with ischemic stroke risk among all obesity indices examined.
Men in the highest quartile of weight-adjusted waist index had a 25% increased ischemic stroke risk (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11–1.36]).
Women in the highest quartile had a 36% increased ischemic stroke risk (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.20–1.57]).
The association was stronger in women than in men.
Analyses were stratified by sex and glucose metabolic status.
Results
Weight-adjusted waist index significantly surpassed BMI in discriminating ischemic stroke risk in both men and women.
In men, C-statistic for weight-adjusted waist index was 0.712 (95% CI, 0.705–0.720) versus BMI 0.688 (95% CI, 0.680–0.696), P<0.0001.
In women, C-statistic for weight-adjusted waist index was 0.748 (95% CI, 0.739–0.757) versus BMI 0.726 (95% CI, 0.717–0.735), P=0.0007.
Both differences in C-statistics were statistically significant.
Women showed higher absolute C-statistic values than men for both weight-adjusted waist index and BMI.
Results
No significant associations were observed between obesity indices and hemorrhagic stroke.
This null finding applied across the obesity indices examined.
The contrast with ischemic stroke findings suggests subtype-specific relationships between adiposity and stroke.
Both Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used in the analysis.
Results
The predictive performance of weight-adjusted waist index was robust across sexes and glucose-regulated populations, with particular relevance for normoglycemic individuals.
Analyses were stratified by glucose metabolic status in addition to sex.
Findings specifically support utility in normoglycemic individuals for ischemic stroke prediction.
The study addressed limitations of current anthropometric tools by comparing multiple indices across these subgroups.
Results support sex-specific adiposity assessment in stroke prevention strategies.
Methods
The study cohort consisted of 398,270 stroke-free UK Biobank participants analyzed retrospectively.
The design was a retrospective cohort study.
Participants were free of stroke at baseline.
Analyses were stratified by both sex and glucose metabolic status.
The large sample size enabled subgroup analyses across multiple obesity indices and stroke subtypes.
Li F, Wang Z, Qi S, Xu Y, Shi C. (2026). Predictive Value of Traditional and Novel Obesity Indices for Stroke and Its Subtypes Across Sexes and Glucose Status: Toward Precision Prevention Strategies.. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.043083