Despite regulatory restrictions following the mercury ban, 12.8% of Korean physicians continued to use mercury sphygmomanometers, awareness of mercury-free BP devices remained suboptimal (50.3% above-average awareness), and compliance with standardized BP measurement protocols was variable, indicating a need for comprehensive education.
Key Findings
Results
Physician preference for mercury sphygmomanometers declined but remained notable after the mercury ban.
Preference for mercury sphygmomanometers shifted from 28.2% before the ban to 12.8% after the ban.
12.8% of physicians continued to use mercury sphygmomanometers even after the ban.
The survey included 1,728 physicians with a 98.9% response rate.
Physicians surveyed were from five specialties: cardiology (9.3%), internal medicine excluding cardiology (27.5%), family medicine (16.1%), general practice (21.6%), and other specialties (34.5%).
Results
Preferences for mercury-free blood pressure devices increased following the mercury ban.
Preference for aneroid devices increased from 13% to 17.4% after the ban.
Preference for hybrid devices increased from 12.6% to 14.5% after the ban.
Preference for automated devices increased from 46.2% to 55.3% after the ban.
Automated devices were the most preferred device type both before and after the ban.
Results
Physician awareness of mercury-free blood pressure devices was suboptimal.
Only 50.3% of physicians had above-average awareness of mercury-free devices.
Awareness was assessed via an online survey containing 31 items covering preferences, awareness of alternative BP devices, and compliance with standardized BP measurement protocols.
The survey used a convenience sample design conducted online.
Results
Compliance with standardized blood pressure measurement protocols (Korean Society of Hypertension Guidelines) was high for some standards but notably lower for others.
High compliance was observed for cuff placement (84.8%), pulse rate measurement (81%), and 5 minutes of rest before measurement (80.3%).
Lower compliance was noted for duplicate BP measurements (59.5%), both-arm measurements (59.5%), and positional BP measurements (52.6%).
Compliance was assessed as part of a 31-item survey instrument.
Methods
The study was conducted as a cross-sectional online survey of physicians across multiple specialties in Korea in the context of the Minamata Convention mercury reduction initiative.
The Minamata Convention initiated global mercury reduction, leading to the phase-out of mercury sphygmomanometers as mercury-containing medical devices.
The survey included 1,728 physicians with a 98.9% response rate.
Five specialties were represented: cardiology, internal medicine excluding cardiology, family medicine, general practice, and other specialties.
BP devices were categorized as mercury-based (mercury sphygmomanometers) or mercury-free (aneroid, hybrid, and automated devices).
Kim Y, Kim E, Shin J, Kim K, Lee E. (2026). Preference, Awareness, and Use of Sphygmomanometers in the Mercury-Free Era: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Physicians in Korea.. Journal of Korean medical science. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e93