Preferences for models of sexual health service delivery among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Australia: a discrete choice experiment.
Ong J, Fraser D, et al. • Journal of the International AIDS Society • 2025
Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Australia have heterogeneous preferences for sexual health service delivery, with most preferring specialist sexual health clinics or GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health, supporting investment in both service types.
Key Findings
Methods
The study recruited 1422 participants across three groups with differing demographic profiles.
396 gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) living with HIV (median age 41, IQR: 32-54)
436 PrEP users (median age 35, IQR: 29-45)
590 non-PrEP users (median age 33, IQR: 26-44)
Participants were recruited via paid advertisements, sexual health clinics, and community networks
Cross-sectional online survey conducted from November 2022 to February 2023
Results
GBM living with HIV were distributed across three latent preference classes for sexual health service delivery.
46.2% preferred sexual health clinics
33.0% preferred GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health
20.7% were willing to go anywhere and willing to pay for services
Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups with similar preferences
Results
PrEP users were divided into two latent preference classes, both involving GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health.
75.2% preferred either PrEP-only clinics or GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health
24.8% preferred GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health only
All PrEP user preference classes involved LGBTQ+-competent GP care as a component
Results
Non-PrEP users showed four distinct latent preference classes, including a substantial group that did not want to test.
44.7% preferred GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health
22.8% preferred any free service
22.2% did not want to test for HIV/STIs
10.2% were unsure of their preferences
Testing reluctance was identified as a key concern unique to this group
Methods
Service delivery attributes examined in the discrete choice experiments included cost, clinic type, appointment type, appointment frequency, extra services, and sample collection location.
Three tailored DCEs were developed, one for each participant group
Attributes were designed to quantify preferences relevant to each group's likely service use
Where samples are taken for HIV/STI testing was included as a distinct attribute
Latent class analyses were applied to DCE data to identify preference subgroups
Results
The study identified financial barriers as a concern, with a preference class among non-PrEP users specifically favouring free services.
22.8% of non-PrEP users preferred 'any free service', suggesting cost is a barrier to engagement
20.7% of GBM living with HIV were willing to pay and go anywhere, indicating cost was less of a barrier for some in that group
Future research was recommended to focus on addressing financial barriers to sexual health services
Conclusions
The authors concluded that investment in both specialist sexual health clinics and LGBTQ+-competent GPs is important to align service models with client needs.
Specialist sexual health clinics were preferred by the largest single class of GBM living with HIV (46.2%)
LGBTQ+-competent GPs featured in preferred service models across all three participant groups
The authors noted that appropriate service investment 'may depend on local resources and infrastructure'
Future research priorities identified included telehealth, digital health interventions, and understanding testing reluctance among non-PrEP users
What This Means
This research surveyed 1,422 gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) in Australia to understand what kinds of sexual health services they prefer. The study used a method called a discrete choice experiment, which asks people to choose between hypothetical service options that vary in features like cost, clinic type, and how testing is done. Three groups were studied separately: men living with HIV, men currently using PrEP (a medication that prevents HIV), and men not using PrEP.
The findings showed that preferences differ significantly across and within these groups. Men living with HIV most commonly preferred specialist sexual health clinics, while men on PrEP strongly favoured GPs with expertise in LGBTQ+ health, either alone or alongside PrEP-specific clinics. Among men not on PrEP, the picture was more varied — nearly one in four said they did not want to be tested at all, which the researchers flagged as a notable concern for public health outreach. Cost was also an important factor, particularly for non-PrEP users, with a sizeable group only willing to use free services.
This research suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach to sexual health services for GBM in Australia is unlikely to meet the community's diverse needs. Instead, investment in both specialist sexual health clinics and in training GPs to provide culturally competent care for LGBTQ+ patients could help more people access appropriate services. The study also highlights the need for further work to understand why some men are reluctant to test for HIV and STIs, and to explore the potential role of telehealth and digital tools in reaching those who may not engage with traditional clinic-based services.
Ong J, Fraser D, Bourne C, Grulich A, Bavinton B. (2025). Preferences for models of sexual health service delivery among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Australia: a discrete choice experiment.. Journal of the International AIDS Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26482