In a retrospective cohort of 144 AIS patients after mechanical thrombectomy, pre-existing hypertension, lower baseline ASPECTS, elevated NLR, longer onset-to-reperfusion time, and delayed start of rehabilitation were independent predictors of poor 90-day functional outcome (mRS >2), and the combined model showed excellent discrimination (AUC 0.964).
Key Findings
Results
Five independent predictors of poor 90-day functional outcome (mRS >2) were identified after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
The analytical cohort comprised 144 subjects in a retrospective cohort analysis.
Poor functional outcome was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) >2.
Predictors were identified by multivariate logistic regression: hypertension, baseline ASPECTS, NLR, onset-to-reperfusion time, and time to start rehabilitation.
Results
Pre-existing hypertension was independently associated with higher odds of unfavorable outcome.
Adjusted OR 6.48, 95% CI 1.03-40.80.
The wide confidence interval, with a lower bound just above 1, indicates imprecise estimation.
Results
Lower baseline ASPECTS was independently associated with unfavorable outcome.
Adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.49.
The OR below 1 reflects that higher ASPECTS was associated with lower odds of poor outcome (imaging domain).
Results
Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome.
Adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46.
NLR represents the inflammatory domain of the prognostic framework.
Results
Longer onset-to-reperfusion time (OTR) was independently associated with unfavorable outcome.
Per-minute adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02.
Results
Delayed start of rehabilitation was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome.
Adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.52-3.46.
Rehabilitation timing represents the rehabilitation domain of the prognostic framework.
Results
The multivariable model combining the predictors showed excellent discrimination for poor outcome.
AUC 0.964, 95% CI 0.940-0.988 by ROC analysis of the composite prediction framework.
The model was developed in a single retrospective cohort of 144 patients; the abstract does not report external validation.
Conclusions
Beyond successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), functional outcomes were independently influenced by factors across imaging, inflammation, and rehabilitation domains.
Additional significant clinical variables were pre-existing hypertension and longer OTR.
The authors conclude the findings support the potential value of a multidimensional prognostic assessment.
What This Means
This study looked back at records of 144 people who had an ischemic stroke (caused by a blocked brain artery) and were treated with mechanical thrombectomy, a procedure that physically removes the clot. The researchers wanted to know which factors were linked to a poor recovery at 90 days, defined as significant disability on a standard scale (mRS above 2).
Five factors were independently linked to worse outcomes: having high blood pressure before the stroke, a lower early brain scan score (ASPECTS, which reflects how much brain tissue was already damaged), a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (a blood marker of inflammation), a longer time from stroke onset to restored blood flow, and a later start of rehabilitation. A model combining these factors separated patients with good and poor outcomes very well (AUC 0.964).
This research suggests that recovery after thrombectomy depends not only on whether the artery is reopened, but also on brain imaging, inflammation, and rehabilitation timing. However, the study was retrospective, small, and from a single analysis, and the very high accuracy figure and some wide confidence intervals (such as for hypertension) mean the results need confirmation in larger, independent studies before being relied on in practice.
Mu S, Li H, Wang Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Liu B, et al.. (2026). Prognostic Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients After Mechanical Thrombectomy Incorporating Imaging, Inflammatory, and Rehabilitation Aspects.. Annali italiani di chirurgia. https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4672