Cardiovascular

Prognostic Value of HALP Score in Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: A Long-Term Follow-up Study.

TL;DR

The HALP score demonstrated a modest but statistically significant ability to predict MACCE in rheumatic mitral stenosis patients, but was not identified as an independent predictor in multivariable analysis, suggesting it may serve as a complementary rather than standalone prognostic tool.

Key Findings

The HALP score showed modest but statistically significant predictive performance for MACCE in rheumatic mitral stenosis patients.

  • AUC = 0.644, p = 0.037 on receiver operating characteristic analysis
  • Optimal cut-off value was 35.65
  • Sensitivity of 60.4% and specificity of 38.1% at the optimal cut-off
  • Study included 169 patients with RMS analyzed retrospectively

Patients with lower HALP scores had a significantly higher incidence of MACCE over long-term follow-up.

  • Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed log-rank p = 0.015
  • Median follow-up period was 124 months (IQR: 96-148)
  • Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)

The HALP score was not identified as an independent predictor of MACCE in multivariable analysis.

  • Cox regression multivariable analysis yielded p = 0.076 for the HALP score
  • The result suggests confounding by other clinical and echocardiographic parameters
  • The HALP score incorporates hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet values

The HALP score is proposed as a simple and cost-effective complementary tool for risk stratification in RMS patients.

  • Authors recommend the HALP score be interpreted alongside established clinical and echocardiographic parameters
  • Its prognostic value appears limited when used alone
  • The score was assessed using ROC analysis, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Kaya A, Ayhan G, Can V, Özbek E, Dursun L, Kümet &. (2026). Prognostic Value of HALP Score in Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: A Long-Term Follow-up Study.. Clinical cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70287