A novel CSP-HPLC method was developed and validated to separate and quantify the enantiomers of lenalidomide and pomalidomide in human plasma, and in 12 multiple myeloma patients the S-enantiomer of LND and enantiomer-I of PMD showed slightly higher plasma concentrations and potentially greater antimyeloma activity.
Key Findings
Results
A novel chiral stationary phase HPLC (CSP-HPLC) method was developed and validated that successfully separated and quantified the enantiomers of lenalidomide and pomalidomide in human plasma.
The method resolved both LND enantiomers (S-(-) and R-(+)) and both PMD enantiomers (designated enantiomer-I and enantiomer-II).
The method was applied to plasma samples from multiple myeloma patients.
The abstract describes the method as both developed and validated.
Results
In patients receiving lenalidomide, the S-(-) enantiomer had slightly higher mean trough and crest plasma concentrations than the R-(+) enantiomer.
S-(-) LND: mean trough 11.98 ng/mL and mean crest 211.44 ng/mL.
R-(+) LND: mean trough 11.13 ng/mL and mean crest 199.86 ng/mL.
Six patients were on LND, all in their second chemotherapy cycle.
Results
In patients receiving pomalidomide, enantiomer-I had slightly higher mean trough and crest plasma concentrations than enantiomer-II.
PMD enantiomer-I: mean trough 1.68 ng/mL and mean crest 71.45 ng/mL.
PMD enantiomer-II: mean trough 1.06 ng/mL and mean crest 69.54 ng/mL.
Six patients were on PMD, all in their second chemotherapy cycle.
Results
Crest concentrations were far higher than trough concentrations for both drugs' enantiomers, and lenalidomide concentrations were higher than pomalidomide concentrations.
LND crest values were about 200-211 ng/mL versus troughs of about 11-12 ng/mL.
PMD crest values were about 70-71 ng/mL versus troughs of about 1-1.7 ng/mL.
This comparison is derived from the reported mean values.
Conclusions
The authors concluded that the S-enantiomer of LND and enantiomer-I of PMD, having slightly higher plasma concentrations, may have greater antimyeloma activity, providing a basis for developing enantiomeric formulations.
The study was exploratory with 12 MM patients (6 LND, 6 PMD).
The authors state the findings could lead to more effective and safer treatments for MM.
The activity inference is described as 'potentially' greater, based on concentration differences.
Background
Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disorder representing 1.8% of all cancers, and immunomodulatory drugs such as LND and PMD are crucial for its treatment.
LND and PMD are chiral compounds, motivating enantiomer-specific quantification.
Blood samples were collected at trough and crest time points.
What This Means
Lenalidomide and pomalidomide are important drugs for multiple myeloma, a cancer of plasma cells. Each drug exists as two mirror-image forms (enantiomers) that are chemically alike but can act differently in the body. Standard drugs contain a mix of both forms, and routine tests don't tell them apart. This study built and validated a laboratory method that can separate and measure each form in blood plasma.
The researchers used the method on blood samples from 12 myeloma patients in their second treatment cycle (6 on lenalidomide, 6 on pomalidomide). For lenalidomide, the S-form was present at slightly higher levels than the R-form, both at the lowest (trough) and highest (crest) points after dosing. For pomalidomide, one form (enantiomer-I) was slightly higher than the other. The differences were small.
This research suggests that the two forms of these drugs may behave a little differently in patients, and that the forms with slightly higher levels might be more active against myeloma. However, the study was very small and exploratory, so these ideas are preliminary. Larger studies would be needed to find out whether single-enantiomer versions of these drugs could be more effective or safer.
Vardhan G, Kumar V, Kumar A, Nath U, Handu S, Dhamija P. (2026). Quantification of lenalidomide and pomalidomide enantiomers in multiple myeloma patients: An exploratory study.. Indian journal of pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_219_26