Exercise & Training

Quantifying differences in high-pressure region mapping between dynamic in-shoe and barefoot plantar pressure in diabetic subjects.

TL;DR

In-shoe and barefoot plantar pressure measurements show broadly consistent key loading areas, but barefoot data frequently identifies additional high-pressure regions not present in-shoe, suggesting that basing offloading insole design on threshold-based barefoot high-pressure regions could reduce specificity and limit pressure reduction for in-shoe high-pressure regions.

Key Findings

In-shoe high-pressure regions were typically observed in similar locations to barefoot walking, but barefoot maps often identified additional high-pressure regions in the toes and lateral forefoot.

  • Study included 25 feet from 16 individuals with high forefoot pressures.
  • In-shoe threshold used was >200 kPa; barefoot threshold used was >450 kPa.
  • Additional regions identified in barefoot data were particularly located in the toes and lateral forefoot.
  • Unmatched regions were common, particularly in barefoot data, reflecting greater sensitivity to localized pressures.

For matched high-pressure regions, in-shoe data showed lower peak pressures and larger contact areas compared to barefoot data.

  • In-shoe regions corresponding to barefoot high-pressure zones had lower peak pressures.
  • In-shoe regions had larger contact areas than their barefoot counterparts.
  • This pattern was consistent across matched regions in the forefoot.

Centroid locations of matched high-pressure regions differed between in-shoe and barefoot systems by 0.23 to 0.60 cm.

  • Centroid positions were compared for all matched regions between in-shoe and barefoot pressure maps.
  • The range of centroid differences was 0.23–0.60 cm across anatomical regions.
  • High-pressure regions were masked, grouped, and labeled by anatomical region before comparison.
  • Pressure maps were averaged over trials and overlaid for comparison.

Barefoot pressure data may overestimate high-risk regions that do not display elevated in-shoe pressures.

  • Barefoot data identified regions exceeding its threshold (>450 kPa) that did not correspond to elevated in-shoe pressures (>200 kPa).
  • Unmatched regions were more common in barefoot data than in in-shoe data.
  • The authors note this reflects greater sensitivity of barefoot measurement to localized pressures.
  • This overestimation could reduce specificity of insole offloading design.

Basing offloading insole design on threshold-based barefoot high-pressure regions could reduce specificity and limit pressure reduction for in-shoe high-pressure regions.

  • Custom accommodative insoles achieve greater pressure reductions when dynamic pressure data informs their design.
  • In-shoe and barefoot data are currently used separately to design insoles, without prior evaluation of their agreement.
  • The authors suggest findings have potential implications for streamlining clinical workflows during pressure-informed insole design.
  • Using barefoot data alone may result in targeting regions that are not actually high-pressure areas during shod walking.

Key loading areas were consistent between in-shoe and barefoot pressure measurement systems.

  • Despite differences in threshold levels (>200 kPa in-shoe vs. >450 kPa barefoot), primary loading locations were broadly concordant.
  • Both systems identified high-pressure regions in the forefoot during walking.
  • In-shoe and barefoot pressure maps were overlaid and compared across 25 feet.
  • The study population was specifically individuals with diabetes and high forefoot pressures.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Heino D, Telfer S, Nagle-Christensen A, Ledoux W, Muir B. (2026). Quantifying differences in high-pressure region mapping between dynamic in-shoe and barefoot plantar pressure in diabetic subjects.. Journal of biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113201