Exercise & Training

Quantifying Objective In-School Physical Activity During Recess and Physical Education in 6-12-Year-Old Children.

TL;DR

Students failed to meet the recommended 150 minutes of in-school moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week, with significant differences in physical activity during recess and P.E. found based on sex, race, academic grade, and presence of a P.E. instructor.

Key Findings

Elementary school students did not meet the recommended 150 minutes of in-school moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week.

  • In-school PA was assessed using hip-worn accelerometers over five consecutive school days.
  • Sample consisted of N=408 students aged 6-12 years.
  • The recommended benchmark of 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous PA was not achieved by students.
  • Assessment covered both structured (P.E.) and unstructured (recess) PA opportunities.

Significant differences in physical activity during recess and P.E. were found based on student sex.

  • MANOVA analyses in SPSS were used to assess differences in PA.
  • Sex was identified as a significant factor differentiating PA levels during both recess and P.E.
  • Accelerometry data from hip-worn devices were analyzed using accelerometry software.

Significant differences in physical activity during recess and P.E. were found based on student race.

  • Race was identified as a significant differentiating factor in PA levels during school-based PA periods.
  • Findings highlight equity concerns in physical activity opportunities across racial groups.
  • Data were collected from N=408 students over five consecutive school days.

Significant differences in physical activity during recess and P.E. were found based on academic grade level.

  • Academic grade was a significant factor in differentiating PA levels during recess and P.E.
  • Students ranged from 6 to 12 years of age, spanning multiple grade levels.
  • MANOVA was used to identify differences across grade levels.

The presence of a P.E. instructor was associated with significant differences in physical activity levels during P.E. and recess.

  • Teachers recorded information regarding P.E. and recess conditions, including instructor presence.
  • Presence of a trained P.E. instructor was identified as a significant factor in PA outcomes.
  • Findings suggest that trained P.E. staff support higher-quality PA opportunities.
  • This finding informed policy recommendations regarding staffing for PA programming.

Objective accelerometry was used to quantify in-school physical activity during both recess and physical education across five consecutive school days.

  • Hip-worn accelerometers were used to objectively measure PA in N=408 students.
  • Monitoring occurred over five consecutive school days.
  • Accelerometry software was used alongside MANOVA in SPSS for data analysis.
  • Teachers recorded contextual information about P.E. and recess periods to complement accelerometry data.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Galloway R, Haynes H, Nelson A, Massey M. (2026). Quantifying Objective In-School Physical Activity During Recess and Physical Education in 6-12-Year-Old Children.. The Journal of school health. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.70132