TUDCA did not significantly reduce infarct volume, improve neurological outcome, or attenuate BBB leakage in either in vivo ischemic stroke model, nor did it preserve barrier permeability or ZO-1 expression in vitro under normoxic or hypoxic conditions.
Key Findings
Results
Intravenous TUDCA (100 mg/kg) did not significantly reduce infarct volume in mice subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) regardless of administration timing.
Male C57BL/6 mice were used in the tMCAO model
TUDCA was administered intravenously at 100 mg/kg either one hour before or after stroke induction
Infarct size was a primary outcome measure
No statistically significant reduction in infarct volume was observed in either pre- or post-treatment groups
Results
Intravenous TUDCA (100 mg/kg) did not significantly reduce infarct volume in mice subjected to permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (dMCAO).
Male C57BL/6 mice were used in the dMCAO model
TUDCA was administered intravenously at 100 mg/kg either one hour before or after stroke induction
Infarct size was assessed as a primary outcome measure
No significant neuroprotective effect was observed in either pre- or post-treatment conditions
Results
TUDCA did not improve neurological outcomes in either the tMCAO or dMCAO mouse models of ischemic stroke.
Neurological score was used as a primary outcome measure alongside infarct size
Treatment was administered either one hour before or after stroke induction in both models
No significant improvement in neurological score was detected under any tested condition
Both pre- and post-treatment paradigms were assessed
Results
TUDCA did not attenuate blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage as assessed by IgG extravasation in vivo.
IgG extravasation served as a primary outcome measure of BBB integrity in vivo
Measurements were taken in both the tMCAO and dMCAO mouse models
TUDCA administration at 100 mg/kg either pre- or post-stroke did not significantly reduce IgG extravasation
BBB leakage was assessed across both ischemic stroke models and both timing conditions
Results
TUDCA did not preserve barrier permeability or ZO-1 expression in a human iPSC-derived BBB organ-on-chip system under normoxic or hypoxic conditions.
A human iPSC-derived BBB organ-on-chip system was used to further assess BBB integrity in vitro
Experiments were conducted under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions to model ischemia
ZO-1, a tight junction protein, was evaluated as a marker of BBB integrity
Neither barrier permeability nor ZO-1 expression was preserved by TUDCA treatment in either condition
Methods
The study employed a multi-model approach including two distinct in vivo mouse models of ischemic stroke and one in vitro human iPSC-derived BBB organ-on-chip system.
In vivo models included transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) and permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (dMCAO)
The in vitro model used a human iPSC-derived BBB organ-on-chip system
Male C57BL/6 mice were used for all in vivo experiments
Primary outcome measures included infarct size, neurological score, IgG extravasation, barrier permeability, and ZO-1 expression
Conclusions
The authors conclude that further optimization of dosing and administration strategies is required to fully evaluate TUDCA's therapeutic potential in ischemic stroke.
The dose tested was 100 mg/kg administered intravenously
Administration timing tested was one hour before or after stroke induction
The authors acknowledge that conditions tested did not demonstrate an effect of TUDCA on ischemic brain injury or BBB integrity features
The conclusion does not rule out therapeutic potential but identifies current conditions as insufficient to demonstrate efficacy
Background
TUDCA was evaluated as a candidate neuroprotective agent in the context of the gut-brain axis and microbial metabolites as modulators of stroke outcome.
TUDCA is described as a taurine-conjugated secondary bile acid
Ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of all strokes and remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide
Emerging evidence on the gut-brain axis and microbial metabolites positioned TUDCA as a candidate therapeutic
The study represents a reassessment of TUDCA's neuroprotective efficacy specifically in ischemic stroke
What This Means
This research suggests that tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), a bile acid compound produced by gut bacteria, does not protect the brain from stroke damage under the conditions tested in this study. Researchers tested TUDCA in two different mouse models of ischemic stroke — the type caused by a blocked blood vessel, which accounts for 87% of all strokes — giving the drug either before or after the stroke occurred. They measured brain damage (infarct size), neurological function, and leakage through the blood-brain barrier, which is a protective layer that normally keeps harmful substances out of the brain. In none of these tests did TUDCA show a significant benefit compared to untreated animals.
The researchers also tested TUDCA in a sophisticated laboratory model called a 'brain-on-a-chip,' which uses human stem cell-derived cells to mimic the blood-brain barrier. Even in this system, TUDCA did not help maintain the integrity of the barrier under low-oxygen conditions meant to simulate stroke. A specific protective protein called ZO-1, which helps hold the barrier together, was also unaffected by TUDCA treatment.
This research suggests that the specific dose (100 mg/kg given intravenously) and timing used in this study are not sufficient to produce neuroprotective effects in ischemic stroke, and that the earlier promise suggested by TUDCA in other disease contexts may not directly translate to stroke. The authors emphasize that different doses, timing strategies, or delivery methods might still need to be explored before TUDCA's potential in stroke treatment can be fully ruled out.
Mousavi S, Ozmen S, Adedokun M, Baran G, Sahin A, Hirt L, et al.. (2026). Reassessment of Neuroprotective Efficacy of TUDCA in Ischemic Stroke: A Multi-Model In Vivo and In Vitro Study.. International journal of molecular sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27198702