EQ-5D performed well in patients with multiple myeloma but showed moderate validity in acute leukaemia and poor validity in lymphoma, with EQ-5D utility values consistently higher than TTO-elicited utility scores across all three haematologic malignancy groups.
Key Findings
Results
TTO utility scores varied across the three haematologic malignancy groups, with acute leukaemia patients scoring highest.
TTO utility scores were highest in AL (0.798), followed by lymphoma (0.755) and MM (0.693).
The study enrolled 158 patients consecutively admitted to a leading tertiary care hospital in China between January and August 2024.
Patient groups comprised MM (n=50), AL (n=63), and lymphoma (n=45).
Results
EQ-5D utility values were consistently higher than TTO utility scores across all three patient groups.
This pattern of EQ-5D overestimation relative to TTO was observed in MM, AL, and lymphoma groups.
TTO-elicited utility scores were used as the reference standard for criterion validity assessment.
The study used a cross-sectional observational design to assess HRQoL using both EQ-5D and TTO instruments.
Results
EQ-5D demonstrated the best psychometric performance in patients with multiple myeloma.
MM patients showed excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's α=0.899.
Criterion validity in MM was the strongest among the three groups, with Spearman's correlation r=0.538 (p<0.001) with TTO.
MM also showed high structural validity on exploratory factor analysis.
These results support the use of EQ-5D as an HRQoL instrument in the MM population.
Results
EQ-5D showed moderate validity in patients with acute leukaemia.
Spearman's correlation between EQ-5D and TTO in AL patients was r=0.386 (p=0.002).
The AL group comprised 63 patients.
The correlation was statistically significant but weaker than that observed in MM patients.
Results
EQ-5D showed poor validity in patients with lymphoma.
Spearman's correlation between EQ-5D and TTO in lymphoma patients was r=0.230 (p=0.129).
The correlation was not statistically significant in the lymphoma group.
The lymphoma group comprised 45 patients.
The poor psychometric performance raises concerns about the appropriateness of EQ-5D as a standalone instrument for HRQoL in lymphoma.
Results
Chronic kidney failure was significantly associated with greater TTO-EQ-5D utility discrepancy in patients with acute leukaemia.
In patients with AL, chronic kidney failure was significantly associated with greater TTO-EQ-5D utility discrepancy (coefficient=0.213, p=0.035).
This finding suggests that adjustments for clinical characteristics such as chronic kidney failure may improve the accuracy of EQ-5D utility values in AL patients.
Patient characteristics associated with discrepancies between EQ-5D and TTO utilities were examined as a secondary outcome.
Qin W, Chen Y, Ouyang Y, Xiao H, Yu D, Zeng C, et al.. (2026). Reliability and validity of EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels in patients with haematologic malignancies: a cross-sectional study in China.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109028