Course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin is characterized by better results for sperm concentration restoration compared with androgenic replacement therapy, though neither method shows satisfactory results for restoration of sperm motility and morphology.
Key Findings
Results
Sperm concentration showed statistically significant negative dynamics in the androgen replacement therapy (AZT) group following stimulating gonadotropin therapy.
The AZT group included 19 men who had received androgen replacement therapy for more than 5 years before stimulating gonadotropin therapy.
Sperm concentration in the AZT group demonstrated 'statistically significant negative dynamics.'
The basic level of statistical significance was p<0.05.
Patients were evaluated at The National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology.
Results
Sperm concentration in the combination therapy (AZT/HG) group did not show statistically significant differences in dynamics following stimulating gonadotropin therapy.
The AZT/HG group included 34 men who received course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin for more than 5 years.
There were 'no statistically significant differences in the dynamics of sperm concentration' in the AZT/HG group.
Statistically significant differences in the value of sperm concentration change were revealed between the two groups.
Groups were comparable in age, BMI, duration of therapy, type of testosterone preparation, and etiology of hypogonadism.
Results
Both the AZT and AZT/HG groups showed statistically significant negative dynamics for sperm motility and morphology following stimulating gonadotropin therapy.
Statistically significant negative dynamics for sperm motility and morphology were observed in both groups.
There were no statistically significant differences in the value of changes in motility and sperm morphology between the two study groups.
Neither method showed satisfactory results for the restoration of sperm motility and morphology.
The total study population was 53 men (AZT n=19; AZT/HG n=34).
Conclusions
Combined testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin therapy produced better sperm concentration restoration outcomes compared to androgen replacement therapy alone.
Course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin 'is characterized by better results for sperm concentration restoration compared with androgenic replacement therapy.'
This was an observational prospective study with more than 5 years of therapy duration before stimulating gonadotropin therapy.
The study aimed to optimize androgen replacement therapy for male hypogonadism to improve reproductive prospects.
Rozhivanova E, Rozhivanov R, Andreeva E, Mel'nichenko G, Mokrysheva N. (2025). [Restoration of ejaculate quality following androgen replacement and combined therapy for hypogonadism].. Problemy endokrinologii. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13545