After accounting for the competing risk of death, the negative consequences of APOE ε4 on executive function decline extend to those with exceptional longevity, while ε2 carriers showed slower verbal episodic memory decline.
Key Findings
Results
APOE ε4 carriers aged 90+ had faster decline in executive function compared to non-ε4 carriers.
Joint model result: β = -0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.02 for executive function decline
20% of the 445 participants were ε4 carriers
ε4 carriers were defined as those with ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, or ε4/ε4 genotypes
Results were similar in both linear mixed-effects models and joint models that accounted for competing risk of death
Results
APOE ε4 carriers did not show substantially different decline in verbal episodic memory or semantic memory compared to non-ε4 carriers.
Verbal episodic memory: β = -0.01, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.05
Semantic memory: β = -0.03, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.02
Both confidence intervals crossed zero, indicating no statistically significant difference from noncarriers
Cognitive domains were assessed using the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Scales every 6 months on up to 11 occasions
Results
APOE ε2 carriers aged 90+ had slower decline in verbal episodic memory compared to non-ε2 carriers.
Joint model result: β = 0.07, 95% CI 0.00-0.15 for verbal episodic memory
15% of the 445 participants were ε2 carriers
ε2 carriers were defined as those with ε2/2 or ε2/3 genotypes
The confidence interval just reached zero, indicating a marginal finding
Results
APOE ε2 carriers showed similar decline in executive function and semantic memory compared to non-ε2 carriers.
Executive function: β = 0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.08
Semantic memory: β = 0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.08
Both confidence intervals crossed zero, indicating no statistically significant difference
Non-ε2 carriers were defined as those with ε3/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, or ε4/ε4 genotypes
Results
Neither ε4 nor ε2 carrier status was substantially associated with mortality hazard in this 90+ population.
54% of participants died during follow-up
Mean follow-up time was 3.9 years (SD 1.63, range 0.68-6.67)
Time to all-cause mortality was calculated from baseline to death
Joint models combined linear mixed-effects and Cox proportional hazard submodels to account for the competing risk of death
Methods
The LifeAfter90 study cohort was a multiethnic sample of 445 individuals aged 90 and older with a mean baseline age of 93 years.
Mean age at baseline: 93 years (SD 2.31, range 90-104)
APOE genotyping was conducted using DNA extracted from saliva
Cognitive assessments were conducted every 6 months on up to 11 occasions
What This Means
This research suggests that even among people who live to age 90 and beyond — a group sometimes thought to have 'survived' typical Alzheimer's risk — carrying the APOE ε4 gene variant still has measurable negative effects on cognitive health. Specifically, people aged 90+ who carried the ε4 variant showed faster decline in executive function (the ability to plan, focus, and manage tasks) compared to non-carriers, even after accounting for the fact that some participants died during the study. Interestingly, ε4 did not appear to affect verbal memory or semantic memory in this age group, suggesting its impact at extreme old age may be more specific than at younger ages.
On the protective side, carrying the APOE ε2 variant — generally considered beneficial for brain health — was associated with slower decline in verbal episodic memory (the ability to recall personally experienced events) among those aged 90+. However, ε2 did not appear to significantly protect executive function or semantic memory in this age group. Neither genetic variant was strongly linked to differences in survival during the study period.
This research is notable because it studied a diverse, multiethnic group of 445 people aged 90 to 104, a population that is rarely included in Alzheimer's research. The findings suggest that genetic factors influencing cognitive aging do not simply 'turn off' at extreme old age, though their effects may shift in nature. Understanding how these genes affect the very old could help researchers better target interventions for an increasingly large segment of the population.
Colbeth H, Posis A, Rizvi B, Decarli C, Glymour M, George K, et al.. (2026). Role of APOE ɛ4 and ɛ2 With Longitudinal Cognitive Decline Among Those With Exceptional Longevity: The LifeAfter90 Study.. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000218596