The novel antimicrobial wound dressing VELVERT demonstrated improved wound healing efficacy and higher antimicrobial activity compared with AQUACEL Ag Foam dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
Key Findings
Results
Complete wound healing was achieved in more patients in the novel dressing group than in the standard dressing group.
14 out of 50 patients in the novel dressing (VELVERT) group achieved complete wound healing
11 out of 50 patients in the standard dressing (AQUACEL Ag Foam) group achieved complete wound healing
Four patients in the standard dressing group showed no improvement in healing whatsoever
Study duration was 28±1 days or complete wound closure, whichever was earlier
Results
The novel dressing group showed nearly double the percentage of total wound area healed compared with the standard dressing group.
60.78% of total wound area healed in the novel dressing group
31.76% of total wound area healed in the standard dressing group
The per-day rate of healing was 2.16% in the novel dressing group
The per-day rate of healing was 1.13% in the standard dressing group
Results
The novel dressing demonstrated substantially greater antimicrobial efficacy, reducing infection rates from 80% to 4% over the course of the study.
On day 0, 80% of patients in the novel dressing group were positive for microorganisms
On day 0, 50% of patients in the standard dressing group were positive for microorganisms
By the end of the study, only 4.0% of patients in the novel dressing group remained positive for infection
By the end of the study, 18% of patients in the standard dressing group remained positive for infection
Infection was identified as 'the foremost impediment to the overall healing of these DFUs'
Methods
The study was a prospective, randomised, two-arm open-label trial enrolling patients with stage 2/3 diabetic foot ulcers.
A total of 100 patients participated, with 50 patients in each group
Patients were enrolled at the Department of Endocrine Surgery, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Patients had diabetes with stage 2/3 DFUs
The study design was open-label with two treatment arms: VELVERT (novel) and AQUACEL Ag Foam (standard)
Conclusions
The novel antimicrobial dressing VELVERT compared favorably to AQUACEL Ag Foam across both wound healing and antimicrobial outcome measures.
VELVERT is manufactured by Datt Mediproducts Pvt. Ltd., India
AQUACEL Ag Foam is manufactured by Convatec, UK, and was used as the standard comparator
The study concluded that the novel dressing 'demonstrated improved wound healing efficacy and higher antimicrobial activity' compared to the standard dressing
Both safety and efficacy were assessed as study endpoints
What This Means
This research suggests that a newer wound dressing called VELVERT may work better than an established dressing (AQUACEL Ag Foam) for treating diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). In a randomized study of 100 patients with DFUs in India, researchers found that wounds treated with the novel dressing healed at roughly twice the daily rate (2.16% per day versus 1.13% per day) and that nearly twice as much of the total wound area had healed by the end of the 28-day study period (60.78% versus 31.76%). Additionally, no improvement at all was seen in four patients using the standard dressing, while all patients using the novel dressing showed at least some progress.
One of the most notable findings concerned infection control. Diabetic foot ulcers are particularly prone to infection, which can slow or prevent healing. Even though more patients in the novel dressing group started out with detectable infections (80% versus 50%), by the end of the study, far fewer of them still had infections (4% versus 18%). This suggests the novel dressing has strong antimicrobial properties that help clear infections and allow wounds to heal more effectively.
This research matters because diabetic foot ulcers are a serious and common complication of diabetes, sometimes leading to amputation if they do not heal properly. Findings like these could help guide clinicians toward more effective dressing choices, though further large-scale and blinded studies would help confirm these results.
Chand G, Singh S, Kumar R, Madhu K. (2026). Safety and efficacy of a novel antimicrobial wound dressing compared with a standard dressing in diabetic foot ulcers.. Journal of wound care. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0190