Exercise & Training

Self-Directed High-Intensity Interval Versus Moderate Continuous Training on Cardiometabolic Health in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TL;DR

HIIT and MCT equally reduce hepatic steatosis in patients with MASLD, suggesting exercise participation matters more than intensity for liver fat reduction, while HIIT provides superior cardiorespiratory benefits.

Key Findings

Both HIIT and MCT significantly reduced hepatic steatosis compared to the observation group, with no between-group difference.

  • Both exercise groups showed significant hepatic steatosis reduction versus OBS (both p < 0.05)
  • No statistically significant difference was found between HIIT (n=46) and MCT (n=49) groups for liver fat reduction
  • Hepatic steatosis was confirmed by ultrasonography at baseline
  • The trial duration was 24 weeks with assessments at baseline and week 24

HIIT achieved greater improvements in peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) than both MCT and the observation group.

  • HIIT produced superior V̇O2peak improvements compared to MCT and OBS (p < 0.05)
  • HIIT protocol consisted of 5 cycles of 4-minute intervals at 80%–90% V̇O2peak with 3-minute recovery at 50% V̇O2peak
  • MCT protocol consisted of 30–40 minutes at 60% V̇O2peak
  • Both exercise groups performed self-directed treadmill training three times weekly in free-living settings

Both HIIT and MCT increased minute ventilation and carbohydrate utilization at moderate-to-high intensities compared to the observation group.

  • Both exercise groups showed significant increases in minute ventilation versus OBS (p < 0.05)
  • Both exercise groups showed significant increases in carbohydrate utilization at moderate-to-high intensities versus OBS (p < 0.05)
  • No between-group differences between HIIT and MCT were reported for these outcomes
  • Outcomes were assessed at baseline and week 24

The trial compared self-directed HIIT versus MCT over 24 weeks in patients with ultrasonography-confirmed NAFLD/MASLD in free-living settings.

  • HIIT group: n=46; MCT group: n=49; non-randomized observation group (OBS): n=20
  • Exercise was self-directed and performed at home, residential gyms, or community fitness facilities
  • Training frequency was three sessions per week for 24 weeks
  • The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04463667)

Exercise participation, rather than exercise intensity, was identified as the more important factor for liver fat reduction in MASLD.

  • Both HIIT and MCT produced equivalent hepatic steatosis reductions despite differing intensities
  • The observation group did not show significant hepatic steatosis reduction
  • Authors concluded 'exercise participation matters more than intensity for liver fat reduction'
  • Exercise is recommended for MASLD but the optimal exercise mode was previously unclear

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Hsieh P, Liu C, Wu C, Wu W, Wang L. (2026). Self-Directed High-Intensity Interval Versus Moderate Continuous Training on Cardiometabolic Health in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70252