Circulating SULT1A2 and SH2B1 vary across adiposity phenotypes, and baseline SH2B1 showed a male-specific exploratory association with early weight-loss response, although this finding was not independent of age and BMI.
Key Findings
Results
Serum SULT1A2 and SH2B1 levels varied significantly across BMI groups in the first cohort of 223 patients.
The first cohort comprised 102 normal weight, 52 overweight, and 69 obese patients.
SULT1A2 differed significantly across BMI groups (P = 0.002).
SH2B1 differed significantly across BMI groups (P = 0.013).
Serum levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Results
Both SULT1A2 and SH2B1 were elevated in the overweight group compared with the normal weight group.
SULT1A2 was significantly higher in the overweight versus normal weight group (P < 0.01).
SH2B1 was significantly higher in the overweight versus normal weight group (P < 0.05).
These findings suggest a non-linear relationship between adiposity and both biomarkers.
Results
The obese group had lower SULT1A2 and SH2B1 levels than the overweight group, with no significant differences versus the normal weight group.
Both biomarkers were lower in obese compared to overweight participants (P < 0.05).
No significant differences were found between obese and normal weight groups for either biomarker.
This pattern suggests a non-monotonic, inverted-U-shaped association between BMI category and both biomarkers.
Results
SULT1A2 exhibited no association with weight loss response across both sexes in the 4-week intermittent fasting cohort.
The second cohort included 49 eligible participants who completed a 4-week intermittent fasting-based weight management program.
Participants were divided into greater weight loss group (weight loss ≥5% of initial body weight) and lesser weight loss group (weight loss <5%).
No significant association between baseline SULT1A2 and weight loss response was found in either males or females.
Results
Male participants with greater weight loss had significantly higher baseline serum SH2B1 levels than those with lesser weight loss, but this association did not persist after multivariable adjustment.
Greater weight loss males had SH2B1 levels of 2477.1 ± 1332.2 ng/mL versus 1298.4 ± 649.6 ng/mL in lesser weight loss males (P = 0.030).
The effect size was large: Hedges' g = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.01–1.97).
After multivariable adjustment for age and baseline BMI, the association was attenuated and did not persist.
This finding is described as an 'exploratory association' given the hypothesis-generating design of the study.
Results
No significant difference in baseline SH2B1 levels was observed between greater and lesser weight loss groups in female participants.
Greater weight loss females had SH2B1 levels of 1325.0 ± 812.3 ng/mL versus 1135.7 ± 488.3 ng/mL in lesser weight loss females.
The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.471).
The effect size was small: Hedges' g = 0.25 (95% CI: -0.49–0.99).
The authors note a sex-specific pattern, with the exploratory association present only in males.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that SH2B1 is a candidate peripheral marker warranting further investigation in larger, independent cohorts.
The study is explicitly framed as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.
The second cohort was limited to 49 participants, constraining statistical power.
The authors highlight that the male-specific SH2B1 finding was not independent of age and BMI after adjustment.
The authors suggest circulating SULT1A2 and SH2B1 may be involved in energy metabolism based on their variation across adiposity phenotypes.
What This Means
This research suggests that two proteins found in the blood — SULT1A2 and SH2B1 — behave differently depending on a person's weight category. In a group of 223 people, both proteins were highest in those who were overweight (but not obese), and lower in people of normal weight and in obese individuals. This non-linear pattern hints that these proteins may play a role in how the body manages energy at different stages of weight gain, though the study was not designed to establish cause and effect.
The study also examined whether baseline levels of these proteins could predict how well people would respond to a 4-week intermittent fasting program in a separate group of 49 participants. Among men, those who lost 5% or more of their body weight had notably higher starting SH2B1 levels than those who lost less — a difference with a large effect size. However, this association disappeared once the researchers accounted for participants' age and starting BMI, meaning SH2B1 alone did not independently predict weight loss success. No meaningful association was seen in women, and SULT1A2 was not linked to weight loss outcomes in either sex.
The researchers are careful to describe this as a hypothesis-generating study, meaning its purpose is to identify leads for future research rather than draw firm conclusions. The small sample sizes — particularly only 49 people in the weight loss portion — limit confidence in the findings. This research suggests that SH2B1 in particular may be worth investigating further in larger studies to determine whether it could eventually serve as a biological marker related to weight management, especially in men.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Lv H, Shi G, Ye Y, Yang Z, Yang J, Zhang M. (2026). Serum SH2B1 and SULT1A2 in relation to adiposity and early weight-loss response: a hypothesis-generating study.. Frontiers in endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1873732