Cardiovascular

Serum β-defensin-3 and inflammatory markers for discriminating diabetic foot infection and infection severity: a retrospective study.

TL;DR

Serum hBD-3 was associated with the presence and severity of diabetic foot infection and provided complementary discriminatory information beyond conventional inflammatory markers, but the combined models remain exploratory and require prospective multicenter external validation before clinical application.

Key Findings

Serum hBD-3 was higher in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) than in patients with non-infected diabetic foot disease.

  • Median (IQR) hBD-3 was 108.9 (86.3, 141.5) pg/mL in DFI vs. 69.8 (56.1, 84.7) pg/mL in non-infected diabetic foot disease, P < 0.001.
  • The retrospective study included 150 participants: 30 healthy controls, 30 diabetes patients without foot disease, 30 with non-infected diabetic foot disease, and 60 with DFI.

Serum hBD-3 increased with DFI severity.

  • The abstract reports that hBD-3 'increased with infection severity'.
  • Restricted cubic spline analyses suggested a nonlinear association between hBD-3 and infection severity.

Higher hBD-3, CRP, PCT and HbA1c and lower albumin were independently associated with prevalent DFI.

  • Factors were identified using logistic regression and LASSO penalized regression.
  • hBD-3 remained associated with DFI alongside conventional inflammatory markers, indicating complementary information.

The final prevalent-DFI model (HbA1c, albumin, hBD-3, CRP, PCT) showed high discrimination with modest optimism after internal validation.

  • Apparent AUC was 0.928.
  • Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.895 using 1,000 bootstrap resamples.

The moderate/severe DFI model (hBD-3, CRP, PCT) showed high discrimination.

  • Apparent AUC was 0.935.
  • Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.917 after 1,000 bootstrap resamples.

hBD-3 had nonlinear associations with both prevalent DFI and infection severity.

  • Restricted cubic spline analyses suggested nonlinear relationships for both outcomes.

The authors conclude hBD-3 adds discriminatory information beyond conventional inflammatory markers but the models are exploratory.

  • The combined models showed 'promising performance but remain exploratory'.
  • Prospective multicenter external validation is required before clinical application.
  • The study was retrospective and small (n=150; 60 DFI).

What This Means

This study looked at whether a blood level of human β-defensin-3 (hBD-3), a natural antimicrobial protein made by skin and other epithelial cells, could help identify infections in the feet of people with diabetes. Researchers reviewed records of 150 people, including healthy controls, people with diabetes but no foot problems, and people with diabetic foot disease with or without infection. People with diabetic foot infection had higher hBD-3 levels than those with non-infected foot disease, and levels rose with infection severity. When hBD-3 was combined with standard markers like CRP and procalcitonin (plus blood sugar control and albumin for detecting infection), statistical models were quite accurate at distinguishing infected from non-infected cases and moderate/severe from milder infections. Accuracy remained high after internal checks (AUC about 0.90 for infection and 0.92 for moderate/severe infection). This research suggests hBD-3 might be a useful additional marker alongside routine tests. However, the study was small, retrospective, and from limited settings, and the models have not been tested in independent groups. Larger prospective multicenter studies are needed before it could be used in clinical care.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Ma Y, Qu Z, Yao Q, Huang H, Yuan C. (2026). Serum &#x3b2;-defensin-3 and inflammatory markers for discriminating diabetic foot infection and infection severity: a retrospective study.. Frontiers in endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1966400