Aging & Longevity

Sex Differences in Associations Between Adversity and Biological Ageing.

TL;DR

In 153,557 UK Biobank participants, the timing of adversity distinguished sex-specific associations with biological ageing, with childhood adversity more strongly associated with ageing markers in females and adulthood adversity more strongly associated with certain ageing markers in males.

Key Findings

Childhood adversity was associated with multiple biological ageing markers primarily in females.

  • Sample comprised 153,557 UK Biobank participants aged 40-69 years.
  • Childhood adversity was associated with a metabolite-predicted age exceeding chronological age in females.
  • Childhood adversity was also associated with greater frailty, shorter telomeres, and weaker grip strength in females.
  • These associations were not equally observed in males, indicating sex-specific vulnerability.

Adulthood adversity was more strongly associated with certain ageing markers in males, particularly greater frailty and weaker grip strength.

  • The association between adulthood adversity and biological ageing markers was stronger in males than in females for frailty and grip strength.
  • This contrasts with the pattern seen for childhood adversity, where females showed stronger associations.
  • Statistically significant sex-by-adversity interactions were observed for frailty and grip strength.

Statistically significant sex-by-adversity interactions were found for frailty and grip strength.

  • Sex-by-adversity interaction tests were used to formally evaluate sex differences in the associations.
  • Interactions were significant for frailty and grip strength specifically.
  • The divergence in sex-specific associations between childhood and adulthood exposure was consistent across several markers.

Adversity exposure was highly prevalent in this population-based sample, with females reporting slightly higher rates than males.

  • 64.6% of males reported exposure to adversity in childhood and/or adulthood.
  • 69.6% of females reported exposure to adversity in childhood and/or adulthood.
  • Adversity was assessed across both childhood and adulthood periods.

The timing of adversity, distinguishing childhood from adulthood exposure, shaped whether females or males showed stronger associations with biological ageing markers.

  • Four biological ageing markers were assessed: metabolomic ageing (metabolite-predicted age), frailty, telomere length, and grip strength.
  • The study used stratified analyses by sex as well as formal sex-by-adversity interaction tests.
  • Findings suggest sex differences in biological ageing profiles may partly reflect distinct sensitive periods of vulnerability.
  • The authors highlight the importance of considering both sex and timing of adversity exposure when examining links to biological ageing.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Mutz J, Di Benedetto L, Hoppen T, Morina N, Aas M. (2026). Sex Differences in Associations Between Adversity and Biological Ageing.. Aging cell. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.70392