Sexual Health

Sexual health and behaviors in homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual Danes: baseline findings in the Project SEXUS cohort study.

TL;DR

In this Danish cohort study, lesbians exhibited no unusual burden of sexual risk indicators and had fewer sexual dysfunctions, whereas gay men and bisexuals of both sexes reported significantly more risky sexual behaviors, sexual victimization, sexual dysfunctions, and other adverse outcomes.

Key Findings

Lesbians were less likely to have had sex with another person in the last year compared to heterosexual women.

  • Analysis based on 59,838 participants including 1,577 homosexuals, 1,500 bisexuals, and 56,761 heterosexuals aged 15-89
  • Sex-specific logistic regression analyses used heterosexuals as the reference group
  • Results were demographically weighted and confounder-adjusted
  • This finding contrasted with gay and bisexual men and bisexual women, who reported higher sex partner numbers

Gay and bisexual men and bisexual women reported higher numbers of sex partners and greater frequencies of masturbation and pornography consumption compared to heterosexuals.

  • Study included 1,577 homosexuals and 1,500 bisexuals as part of the Project SEXUS cohort
  • Findings were based on adjusted odds ratios (aORs) from sex-specific logistic regression analyses
  • These behaviors were assessed via questionnaire data
  • Lesbians did not show this same pattern of elevated sexual activity indicators

Premature ejaculation was significantly less common among gay and bisexual men compared to heterosexual men.

  • aOR for gay men: 0.50 (95% CI, 0.32–0.81)
  • aOR for bisexual men: 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41–0.93)
  • Both estimates indicated statistically significant reductions in premature ejaculation prevalence
  • Results were confounder-adjusted and demographically weighted

Erectile dysfunction was significantly more common among gay men, both in the last 4 weeks and the last year, and also more common among bisexual men in the last year.

  • Erectile dysfunction in the last 4 weeks (IIEF-5 score ≤11): aOR for gay men 3.01 (95% CI, 1.42–6.38)
  • Erectile dysfunction in the last year: aOR for gay men 2.88 (95% CI, 1.87–4.43)
  • Erectile dysfunction in the last year: aOR for bisexual men 1.91 (95% CI, 1.24–2.92)
  • The IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function) is an internationally validated outcome measure

Gay men more often reported orgasmic dysfunction compared to heterosexual men.

  • aOR for orgasmic dysfunction among gay men: 1.80 (95% CI, 1.09–2.99)
  • This finding was statistically significant
  • Orgasmic dysfunction was among several sexual dysfunctions assessed in the study
  • Bisexual men did not show a statistically significant elevation in this specific outcome based on reported figures

Overall female sexual dysfunction was less common among lesbians and bisexual women, though vaginal cramp dysfunction was more common in bisexual women.

  • Overall female sexual dysfunction (FSFI-6 score ≤19): aOR for lesbians 0.63 (95% CI, 0.40–0.98)
  • Overall female sexual dysfunction: aOR for bisexual women 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48–0.89)
  • Vaginal cramp dysfunction aOR for bisexual women: 2.16 (95% CI, 1.15–4.06)
  • The FSFI-6 (Female Sexual Function Index) is an internationally validated outcome measure

Sexual victimization was reported at substantially higher rates among gay men, bisexual men, and bisexual women compared to their heterosexual counterparts.

  • aOR for sexual victimization among gay men: 5.74 (95% CI, 3.72–8.85)
  • aOR for sexual victimization among bisexual men: 5.03 (95% CI, 3.36–7.54)
  • aOR for sexual victimization among bisexual women: 2.67 (95% CI, 2.25–3.16)
  • Sexual victimization was classified as a sexual risk indicator in the study
  • Lesbians did not show an unusual burden of sexual risk indicators

Gay and bisexual men more often reported dissatisfaction with the appearance of their bodies and genitals compared to heterosexual men.

  • Body and genital appearance dissatisfaction was assessed as part of broader sexual health and behavior outcomes
  • This finding applied to both gay men and bisexual men
  • The pattern was not reported for lesbian or bisexual women in the same manner
  • Results were based on adjusted analyses controlling for demographic confounders

The Project SEXUS study was a large national cohort with broad age coverage but had a modest response rate that may limit representativeness.

  • Total sample: 59,838 participants aged 15–89 years
  • Response rate was 34.6%
  • Limitations include potential for self-selection bias and information biases
  • Generalizability to other countries is uncertain
  • Strengths included the large sample size, broad coverage, and national representativeness within Denmark

What This Means

This research used data from nearly 60,000 Danish people aged 15 to 89 to compare the sexual health, behaviors, and experiences of gay, bisexual, and heterosexual individuals. The study found that lesbians generally fared similarly to or better than heterosexual women on many sexual health measures — they were less likely to experience overall female sexual dysfunction and did not show an elevated burden of risky sexual behaviors or victimization. In contrast, gay men and bisexual individuals of both sexes faced a notably higher burden of sexual health challenges, including more sexual dysfunctions, more risky sexual behaviors, and dramatically higher rates of reported sexual victimization. Specifically, gay men were about three times more likely to experience erectile dysfunction in the past four weeks compared to heterosexual men, and nearly six times more likely to report sexual victimization. Bisexual women, while less likely to have overall sexual dysfunction, were more than twice as likely to report vaginal cramp dysfunction and nearly three times more likely to report sexual victimization. Gay and bisexual men also more frequently reported dissatisfaction with the appearance of their bodies and genitals. This research suggests that gay men and bisexual individuals may face distinct and significant sexual health challenges that warrant greater attention from healthcare providers and researchers. The study's large, nationally representative Danish sample is a strength, though its modest response rate of 34.6% and potential for self-selection bias are important limitations. The authors note that findings may not generalize to other countries, and call for further investigation and increased clinical attention to these disparities.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Schweizer F, Dalgaard L, Graugaard C, Andersson M, Frisch M. (2025). Sexual health and behaviors in homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual Danes: baseline findings in the Project SEXUS cohort study.. The journal of sexual medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf220