Short-Term In-Season Strength Training With Functional Electromechanical Devices Versus Pulley-Based Systems: Performance and Body-Composition Outcomes in Handball Players.
Rodríguez Perea &, Martínez-García D, Chirosa-Ríos I, Soto García D • International journal of sports physiology and performance • 2026
Both FEMD and FWPB strength-training methods improved neuromuscular performance and body composition in handball players during the competitive season, with no clear superiority of either modality.
Key Findings
Results
No significant time × group interaction effects were observed for most outcomes, indicating similar overall training adaptations between FEMD and FWPB groups.
Seventeen semiprofessional male handball players were randomly assigned to FEMD (n = 8) or FWPB (n = 9) groups.
A 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA (time × group interaction) was used to assess intervention effects.
P > .05 for most time × group interaction effects.
The intervention lasted 4 weeks during the competitive season.
Results
Both groups improved standing throwing velocity following the 4-week intervention.
Significant main effect of time for standing throwing velocity (P < .001, ηp2 = .621).
No significant time × group interaction was reported for standing throwing velocity, indicating both groups improved similarly.
The large effect size (ηp2 = .621) suggests a practically meaningful improvement.
Results
The FWPB group demonstrated a significantly higher overall jumping throwing velocity compared to the FEMD group.
Significant group effect for jumping throwing velocity (P = .025, ηp2 = .293).
This represents a medium effect size (ηp2 = .293).
This was one of the few outcomes where a between-group difference was observed.
Results
Both FEMD and FWPB training improved various FEMD-based and pulley-based strength variables over the 4-week period.
FEMD-based strength variables improved with P < .036 and ηp2 > .261 for time effects.
Most pulley-based strength variables improved with P < .001 for time effects.
FWPB showed additional specific gains in certain strength and power parameters (P < .05).
No clear superiority of either modality was established for overall strength outcomes.
Results
Both groups showed overall increases in soft lean mass, while body-fat percentage remained unchanged.
Significant main effect of time for soft lean mass (P = .002, ηp2 = .494).
The FWPB group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in soft lean mass (P = .043).
Body-fat percentage did not change significantly in either group.
The effect size for soft lean mass (ηp2 = .494) indicates a large effect.
Conclusions
A short 4-week in-season strength training program was sufficient to maintain and enhance physical capacities including throwing velocity in semiprofessional handball players.
The study used a 4-week in-season intervention design.
Participants were semiprofessional male handball players.
Both throwing velocity and neuromuscular strength variables showed improvements despite the brief duration.
Authors note the results 'highlight the relevance of in-season strength training for maintaining and enhancing physical capacities.'
Rodríguez Perea &, Martínez-García D, Chirosa-Ríos I, Soto García D. (2026). Short-Term In-Season Strength Training With Functional Electromechanical Devices Versus Pulley-Based Systems: Performance and Body-Composition Outcomes in Handball Players.. International journal of sports physiology and performance. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0215