Single-item versus scale: Comparing respondent demographic, social, and health characteristics by measure of loneliness using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) data.
Chamberlain S, Griffith L, et al. • PloS one • 2026
The direct single-item question and the indirect multi-item scale provided comparable overall classifications of loneliness, but respondent characteristics varied across more granular response categories, highlighting the importance of measure selection depending on study aims.
Key Findings
Results
The majority of CLSA respondents were classified consistently by both loneliness measures, but approximately one in five were classified differently depending on the measure used.
Total sample included 43,235 CLSA respondents from baseline (2010-2015) and follow-up 1 (2015-2018)
14% (n=5,848) were identified as lonely by both the single-item question and the 3-item scale
67% (n=28,998) were identified as not lonely by both measures
19% were classified differently depending on which measure was used
Results
Individuals identified as lonely by both measures were more often older, women, less educated, and had lower income.
This pattern was consistent across both the single-item CES-D-10 question and the 3-item Loneliness Scale
These characteristics were identified through unweighted descriptive statistics examining demographic, social, and health characteristics across measures and response categories
The sample drew from both the Tracking cohort (computer-assisted telephone interviews) and Comprehensive cohort (in-home assessment)
Results
Those classified as severely lonely on the single-item question but not lonely on the scale were older than other groups.
This finding emerged from cross-tabulation of ordinal response categories between the two measures
The ordinal classification used three categories: not lonely, moderately lonely, and severely lonely
This discordant group represents a subset of the 19% classified differently by the two measures
Results
Respondents who were moderately lonely on the single-item question tended to be married, report higher income, and have greater social contact.
This profile differed notably from those classified as severely lonely or from those identified as lonely by the scale
This group also represents part of the discordant 19% classified differently across measures
Social contact was among the social characteristics examined alongside demographic and health characteristics
Methods
Loneliness was measured using two instruments: a direct single-item question from the CES-D-10 and the indirect 3-item Loneliness Scale.
The single-item question came from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10)
The multi-item measure was the 3-item Loneliness Scale, which is an indirect measure
Both dichotomous (lonely/not lonely) and ordinal (not lonely, moderately lonely, severely lonely) classifications were used for analysis
The study was a cross-sectional analysis of population-based survey data
Methods
The CLSA sample included respondents from both Tracking and Comprehensive cohorts at baseline and first follow-up.
Baseline data collection occurred from 2010-2015 and follow-up 1 from 2015-2018
The Tracking cohort used computer-assisted telephone interviews
Chamberlain S, Griffith L, Savage R, Batara J, Yan W, Gruneir A. (2026). Single-item versus scale: Comparing respondent demographic, social, and health characteristics by measure of loneliness using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) data.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341572