Cardiovascular

Social Determinants of Health and Their Impacts on Stroke Prevention and Outcomes.

TL;DR

Inclusion of social determinants of health in stroke management is critical to improving outcomes, and must be evaluated as a requirement for effective stroke prevention and rehabilitation starting during acute hospitalization and continuing through outpatient management.

Key Findings

Social determinants of health are frequently overlooked in stroke management despite their critical role in improving outcomes.

  • The paper identifies social determinants of health as 'often unrecognized and frequently overlooked' in stroke management contexts.
  • The authors argue that evaluation of social determinants of health should be 'a requirement for effective stroke prevention and rehabilitation.'
  • The review covers structural, social status, intermediate, intrapersonal, and biological determinants of health inequities.

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke working group framework (Determinants of Inequities in Neurological Disease, Health, and Well-being) was used to organize the review of health inequities after stroke.

  • The framework is referred to as the NINDS working group 'Determinants of Inequities in Neurological Disease, Health, and Well-being' framework.
  • The framework encompasses five categories: structural, social status, intermediate, intrapersonal, and biological determinants.
  • The framework is applied specifically to equity in neurologic health after stroke.

Social determinants of health must be incorporated into poststroke management beginning during acute hospitalization and continuing through outpatient care.

  • The authors state it is 'critical to include social determinants of health as components of poststroke management, starting during the acute hospitalization and continuing through outpatient management.'
  • This integration is framed as necessary specifically for optimizing secondary stroke prevention and improving stroke outcomes.
  • The recommendation covers both the inpatient and outpatient phases of stroke care.

Interdisciplinary services are identified as essential resources for addressing social determinants of health in stroke survivors and their caregivers.

  • Named interdisciplinary services include social work, care coordination, behavioral health, physical and occupational therapy, speech and language pathology, and chaplaincy.
  • These services are described as providing 'additional resources to help stroke survivors and their caregivers.'
  • The inclusion of chaplaincy alongside clinical disciplines reflects a broad, holistic conception of poststroke support.

What This Means

This research suggests that factors outside of purely medical care — such as a person's income, housing, social support, education, and access to resources — play a critical role in whether someone has a stroke, recovers well from one, or experiences another stroke. Despite their importance, these so-called 'social determinants of health' are often ignored or missed in standard stroke care. The authors use a formal framework developed by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to systematically examine how structural factors (like racism and poverty), social status, and personal circumstances all contribute to health inequities in stroke. This research suggests that addressing these social factors should begin the moment a stroke patient is admitted to the hospital and should continue throughout their recovery and outpatient follow-up. Rather than treating stroke as a purely biological event, care teams need to assess what social and environmental challenges each patient faces. The paper highlights that a wide range of professionals — including social workers, care coordinators, mental health providers, physical and occupational therapists, speech pathologists, and even chaplains — all have roles to play in supporting stroke survivors and their families. The practical implication is that hospitals and healthcare systems should build systems that routinely screen stroke patients for social needs and connect them to appropriate support services. This research suggests that failing to do so leaves a major gap in stroke prevention and recovery, particularly for people from disadvantaged or marginalized communities who may already face higher stroke risk and worse outcomes.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Ifejika N. (2026). Social Determinants of Health and Their Impacts on Stroke Prevention and Outcomes.. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.). https://doi.org/10.1212/cont.0000000000001708