Stunting and low socioeconomic status are consistently linked to poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes in young Malagasy children, with nutritional and social factors playing a primary role and gut microbiota diversity playing a more limited role in neurodevelopment.
Key Findings
Results
Stunting was consistently associated with poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes across multiple developmental domains.
Children were assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) covering five developmental domains: communication, personal-social, problem-solving, fine and gross motor
The study used a cross-sectional design from the Afribiota study in Madagascar with 2-5-year-old children
Both bivariate and multivariate analyses as well as Structural Equation Modelling confirmed the association between stunting and neurodevelopmental delays
Stunting was assessed in children aged 2-5 years from Antananarivo, Madagascar
Results
Low socioeconomic status was consistently linked to poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Socioeconomic status was identified as a consistent determinant of neurodevelopment across multiple analytical approaches
Classical bi- and multivariate analysis combined with Structural Equation Modelling were used to evaluate direct and indirect associations
The study supports the hypothesis that neurodevelopment is primarily influenced by social factors alongside nutritional factors
Socioeconomic factors outweighed gut microbiota influence on neurodevelopment
Results
Low branched-chain amino acids and hemoglobin levels were associated with stunting.
Branched-chain amino acids were identified as a nutritional factor linked to stunting status
Hemoglobin levels were also associated with stunting, suggesting a nutritional/anemia pathway
These nutritional markers represent indirect pathways through which nutrition may influence neurodevelopment via stunting
The associations were identified through Structural Equation Modelling examining direct and indirect associations
Results
Higher within-individual microbial diversity (alpha-diversity, specifically the Shannon index) was directly linked to improved neurodevelopment scores in one of the tested models.
The Shannon index was the specific alpha-diversity metric associated with neurodevelopment
The association with alpha-diversity was found in one of the tested models, indicating the finding was not uniformly robust across all analytical approaches
Fecal samples were analyzed via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
The association with Shannon diversity was described as a direct link to improved neurodevelopment scores
Results
Gut microbiota variation between individuals (beta-diversity) was not associated with neurodevelopment.
Beta-diversity, representing gut microbiota variation between individuals, showed no association with neurodevelopmental outcomes
This contrasts with the limited positive association found for alpha-diversity (Shannon index)
Fecal microbiota was characterized using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
The null finding for beta-diversity supports the conclusion that microbiota composition differences between children do not drive neurodevelopmental variation in this population
Conclusions
The study concludes that nutritional and social factors primarily influence neurodevelopment, with a more limited role for microbiota diversity.
The findings support the hypothesis that neurodevelopment is primarily influenced by nutritional and social factors
The role of gut microbiota diversity in neurodevelopment was characterized as 'more limited'
Structural Equation Modelling was used to evaluate both direct and indirect associations between clinical factors, microbiota, and neurodevelopment
The study population comprised 2-5-year-old children from the Afribiota cross-sectional study in Antananarivo, Madagascar
Tamarelle J, Doria M, Rambolamanana V, Rajaonarivo T, Ferreira A, Rakotondrainipiana M, et al.. (2026). Socioeconomic and nutritional determinants outweigh gut microbiota influence on neurodevelopment in young children from Antananarivo, Madagascar.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35174-5