Mental Health

Sound Distraction and Mental Health in the Workplace: The Role of Coping Strategies.

TL;DR

Perceived sound distraction and disturbance in office environments are significantly associated with mental health outcomes including exhaustion, fatigue, and disengagement, with coping strategies and noise sensitivity playing key moderating roles in these relationships.

Key Findings

Stressful mood was significantly associated with multiple mental health outcomes including exhaustion, fatigue, poor sleep quality, and disengagement.

  • Stressful mood was associated with exhaustion (β = 0.57, t = 6.64) and fatigue (β = 0.21, t = 4.86)
  • Stressful mood was also correlated with poor sleep quality (β = -0.59, t = -4.42) and disengagement (β = -0.34, t = -2.88)
  • Data were collected from two organisations with N = 214 participants
  • Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the relationships
  • The measurement model confirmed that three items loaded onto each mental health factor, which were strongly interrelated

Perceived distraction was negatively related to concentration ability in office workers.

  • Perceived distraction was negatively related to concentration (β = -0.67, t = -5.38)
  • Employees reporting low concentration and poor sleep tended to feel more disengaged
  • The lack of concentration spaces and frequent individual-focused tasks amplified distraction and disturbance

Disturbance from unintelligible background sounds and disturbance from intelligible speech had opposite relationships with exhaustion.

  • Disturbance from unintelligible background sounds was linked to higher exhaustion (β = 0.10, t = -2.99)
  • Disturbance from intelligible speech showed an inverse relationship with exhaustion (β = -0.11, t = -2.63)
  • Both disturbance types were strongly correlated with each other and both were associated with increased distraction

Coping strategies adopted by employees were predominantly avoidance-based and differed by type of sound disturbance.

  • Working more slowly than usual was associated with disturbance from speech (β = 0.18, t = 3.17)
  • Trying to be quieter was linked to disturbance from unintelligible sounds (β = 0.28, t = 3.44)
  • Coping strategies were described as predominantly avoidance-based

Greater effort as a coping strategy showed a paradoxical relationship with fatigue and disengagement.

  • Greater effort was paradoxically related to higher fatigue (β = 0.24, t = 2.41)
  • Greater effort was also associated with lower disengagement (β = -0.098, t = -2.46)
  • This finding suggests that approach-oriented coping may have both costs and benefits for mental health outcomes

Noise-sensitive employees reported higher stressful mood and were more likely to adopt avoidance coping strategies.

  • Noise-sensitive employees reported higher stressful mood (β = 0.19, t = 3.62)
  • Noise-sensitive employees were more likely to adopt avoidance coping strategies (β = 0.42, t = 6.88)
  • Personal characteristics such as noise sensitivity were examined as part of the Person-Environment Fit theoretical framework

The study recommends organisational interventions to reduce chronic noise stressors and encourage approach-oriented coping.

  • Organisations should reduce chronic noise stressors and encourage approach-oriented coping to mitigate long-term risks
  • Providing acoustically optimised spaces and interventions such as sound masking can improve person-environment fit and support employee well-being
  • The lack of concentration spaces was identified as an amplifier of distraction and disturbance
  • The study was guided by Person-Environment Fit theory

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Bergefurt L, Appel-Meulenbroek R, Arentze T. (2026). Sound Distraction and Mental Health in the Workplace: The Role of Coping Strategies.. Noise & health. https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_189_25