Cardiovascular

Specific interventions as part of a quality improvement collaborative enhance care for ischemic stroke patients.

TL;DR

Feedback on baseline performance within a quality improvement collaborative was followed by improved temperature measurement and swallowing screening in ischemic stroke care, and dissemination of an e-learning tool was associated with improved glycemia, swallowing, and depression screening, though overall adherence remained low.

Key Findings

Adherence to temperature measurement in ischemic stroke patients increased significantly from 2019 (MP1) to 2022 (MP2) across 24 hospitals.

  • Adherence rose from 18% to 25% (p = 0.004).
  • Data came from retrospective review of 30 consecutive ischemic stroke patient records per center, 580 patients in MP1 and 588 in MP2.
  • All hospitals received feedback on MP1 performance between measurement periods.

Swallowing screening adherence improved significantly between the two measurement periods.

  • Adherence rose from 36% to 59% (p < 0.001).
  • Multicenter intervention study with 24 hospitals; patient records analyzed retrospectively.
  • Feedback on baseline performance was provided to all hospitals.

No significant overall changes were observed for glycemia measurement, ADL screening, or depression screening between MP1 and MP2.

  • The abstract reports no significant changes for these three process measures across all hospitals.
  • Overall adherence to the FeSS+ recommendations remained low.

The e-learning tool on FeSS+ was delivered to teams at 18 of the 24 hospitals (75%).

  • The e-learning tool was optional and offered to all hospitals in addition to the feedback.
  • Hospitals were compared based on whether they disseminated the tool.

Improvements in glycemia management, swallowing screening, and depression screening were observed only in hospitals that disseminated the e-learning tool.

  • Reported p-values were 0.01 for glycemia, <0.001 for swallowing screening, and <0.001 for depression screening.
  • This suggests the specific intervention was associated with improvement beyond feedback alone.

Temperature measurement improved more in hospitals that did not use the e-learning tool than in those that did.

  • Odds ratio was 2.62 in hospitals without e-learning vs. 1.27 in hospitals with e-learning (p = 0.03).
  • The e-learning tool was therefore not associated with added benefit for temperature measurement.

Overall adherence to the recommended care processes remained low despite the improvements, indicating a need for continued quality improvement.

  • Even after improvement, temperature measurement adherence was only 25% and swallowing screening 59%.
  • The authors conclude that specific interventions play a role in improving care processes.

What This Means

This study looked at whether a quality improvement program could help hospitals follow guidelines for stroke care. The guidelines call for checking body temperature, checking blood sugar, and screening for swallowing problems, and the program also added screening for daily living abilities and depression. Twenty-four hospitals took part. Researchers reviewed 30 consecutive ischemic stroke patient records per hospital in 2019 and again in 2022, after hospitals received feedback on their performance and were offered an optional e-learning tool. Temperature checking rose from 18% to 25% and swallowing screening from 36% to 59%. Blood sugar, daily living, and depression screening did not change significantly overall. However, hospitals that passed on the e-learning tool to their teams showed improvement in blood sugar management, swallowing screening, and depression screening, while those that did not use it did not. Temperature measurement improved more in hospitals without the e-learning tool. This research suggests that giving hospitals feedback can help, and that targeted tools like e-learning may add further benefit for some care steps. Still, adherence stayed low for most measures, so ongoing efforts appear to be needed. The study compared records before and after and was not a randomized trial, so it cannot prove that the interventions caused the changes.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Lens C, Coeckelberghs E, Seys D, Vanhaecht K, Bekelaar K, Blondia R, et al.. (2026). Specific interventions as part of a quality improvement collaborative enhance care for ischemic stroke patients.. Frontiers in neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1830076