State-level anti-TGD legislation was marginally associated with greater suicidal ideation, with sports-related laws predicting higher suicidal ideation and bathroom-related laws predicting more suicide attempts among TGD young adults.
Key Findings
Results
Overall state-level anti-TGD legislation was marginally associated with greater suicidal ideation among TGD young adults.
Data were drawn from the Healthy Minds Study from Spring 2022 to Spring 2023
The sample included 8,149 TGD participants from 38 U.S. states
Multilevel modeling was used to examine relationships between state-level legislation passed in 2023 and individual-level mental health variables
The association was described as 'marginal' rather than statistically robust
Results
Sports-related anti-TGD laws predicted higher suicidal ideation in TGD young adults within affected states.
Sports-related anti-TGD laws were examined as a specific legislative subcategory
The relationship was found at the state level, meaning it applied to TGD individuals residing in states with such laws
This was identified as a statistically significant predictor distinct from the overall anti-TGD legislation index
The finding was identified within the multilevel modeling framework
Results
Bathroom-related anti-TGD laws predicted more suicide attempts among TGD young adults within their respective states.
Bathroom-related laws restricting access to public facilities were examined as a distinct legislative subcategory
The outcome measure was suicide attempts, distinct from suicidal ideation
This represents a behavioral outcome (attempts) rather than only ideation, suggesting a potentially more severe mental health impact
The relationship was identified through multilevel modeling controlling for other variables
Results
Pro-TGD legislation was not associated with improved mental health outcomes among TGD young adults.
The study examined both pro- and anti-TGD legislation to assess bidirectional relationships with mental health
Pro-TGD legislation categories may have included antibullying and nondiscrimination protections
The null finding for pro-TGD legislation contrasts with prior research suggesting protective laws reduce poor outcomes
The authors note this finding despite prior literature demonstrating that protective laws generally reduce poor mental health outcomes for TGD individuals
Background
The United States has seen sharp increases in anti-TGD state legislation including limits on gender-affirming care, public facility restrictions, and constraints on public gender expression.
Legislative categories examined included limits on access to gender-affirming care, restrictions on access to public facilities, and constraints on public gender expression and presentation
Legislation passed in 2023 was specifically examined in the multilevel models
The study spans Spring 2022 to Spring 2023, capturing a period of accelerating legislative activity
Prior research cited demonstrates that structural stigma generally leads to poorer mental health outcomes for TGD individuals
Discussion
The authors conclude that findings signal the potential devastating impact of newer anti-TGD federal policies on TGD suicide.
The authors explicitly extrapolate from state-level findings to potential federal policy impacts
The discussion emphasizes the importance of advocacy and civic engagement among clinicians working with TGD populations
The authors frame the findings as demonstrating 'the harm of anti-TGD state laws on TGD mental health'
Structural changes are identified as necessary to improve TGD mental health
What This Means
This research suggests that laws targeting transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people at the state level are linked to worse mental health outcomes, particularly suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts, among TGD young adults. The study analyzed survey data from over 8,000 TGD college-age individuals across 38 U.S. states collected between 2022 and 2023, using statistical methods that account for the fact that people live within specific state policy environments. Notably, laws restricting transgender participation in sports were associated with higher rates of suicidal thoughts, and laws restricting bathroom access were associated with higher rates of actual suicide attempts.
Interestingly, the study also found that laws designed to protect TGD people — such as nondiscrimination or antibullying protections — were not associated with measurable improvements in mental health in this sample. The overall link between anti-TGD legislation and suicidal ideation was described as 'marginal,' meaning it was present but not overwhelmingly strong statistically, while the specific effects of sports and bathroom laws on suicidality were more pronounced.
This research suggests that the policy environment in which TGD people live may have meaningful consequences for their psychological wellbeing, particularly their risk for suicidal crisis. The authors argue that these state-level findings may foreshadow harmful effects from similar federal-level policies, and they call on mental health clinicians to engage in advocacy efforts aimed at changing laws that may be harming TGD individuals' mental health.
Pellicane M, Weixel T, Ciesla J. (2026). State-level pro- and anti-transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) legislation and mental health among TGD young adults in the United States.. The American psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001661