Cardiovascular

Stent-assisted coiling for ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: A retrospective observational study evaluating safety, efficacy, and antiplatelet strategies.

TL;DR

Endovascular treatment, particularly stent-assisted coiling, appears to be a safe and feasible option for ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysms, with potential for durable occlusion, though findings are hypothesis-generating given the small sample size.

Key Findings

No procedure-related mortality occurred in either the coiling-alone or stent-assisted coiling groups for ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysms treated within 72 hours of ictus.

  • 29 consecutive patients were treated endovascularly within 72 hours of ictus
  • Patients were stratified by technique: coiling alone (n=11) vs stent-assisted coiling (SAC, n=18)
  • Periprocedural complication rates were comparable between groups (all P > .05)

The overall rate of ischemic events was higher in the SAC group than in the coiling-alone group.

  • Ischemic events (including intraoperative thrombosis and symptomatic infarction) occurred in 27.8% (5/18) of the SAC group
  • Ischemic events occurred in 9.1% (1/11) of the coiling-alone group
  • Despite this difference, periprocedural complication rates were described as comparable between groups (all P > .05)

Favorable clinical outcomes at 6 months were achieved at similarly high rates in both the coiling-alone and SAC groups.

  • Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at 6 months was achieved in 90.9% of the coiling-alone group and 88.9% of the SAC group
  • At discharge, favorable outcomes were 72.7% (coiling-alone) vs 77.8% (SAC)
  • After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, SAC was associated with an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.14-9.09) for favorable outcome

SAC demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in aneurysm recurrence compared to coiling alone, though this finding has a fragility index of 1.

  • Recurrence rate was 0% in the SAC group vs 27.3% in the coiling-alone group (P = .045)
  • The fragility index was 1, indicating the result is statistically fragile
  • The absolute risk reduction for recurrence was 27.3% (95% CI: 1.0%-53.6%), corresponding to a number needed to treat of 3.7 (95% CI: 2.1-14.9)

SAC showed a trend toward higher complete aneurysm occlusion compared to coiling alone, though this did not reach statistical significance.

  • Complete occlusion was achieved in 88.9% of the SAC group vs 63.6% of the coiling-alone group
  • This difference was not statistically significant (P = .16)
  • The authors described this as 'a trend toward higher complete occlusion'

No significant differences in outcomes were observed between dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and intravenous tirofiban within the SAC subgroup.

  • Within the SAC cohort (n=18), patients received either DAPT (n=7) or intravenous tirofiban (n=11)
  • No significant differences were observed between DAPT and tirofiban for any reported outcomes
  • The authors concluded that 'both DAPT and tirofiban appear to be feasible antiplatelet strategies based on the limited data available'

What This Means

This research examines how to safely treat a rare type of brain aneurysm — one located on the anterior choroidal artery — after it has ruptured and caused a hemorrhagic stroke. The study looked at 29 patients who received endovascular (catheter-based) treatment within 72 hours of their aneurysm rupturing. Some patients received standard coil embolization (inserting tiny metal coils to block off the aneurysm), while others received stent-assisted coiling (SAC), where a small mesh tube is placed in the artery to help hold the coils in place. The researchers found that both approaches were relatively safe, with no treatment-related deaths, and that about 90% of patients in both groups had good functional outcomes six months later. The main potential advantage of the stent-assisted approach was in preventing the aneurysm from coming back: none of the SAC patients had a recurrence compared to 27.3% in the coiling-alone group. However, the researchers caution that this finding is statistically fragile — changing the outcome of just one patient would make the result no longer significant — so it should be interpreted carefully. SAC was also associated with more ischemic (blood-clot-related) events during or after the procedure (27.8% vs 9.1%), though this did not translate into worse overall outcomes, possibly due to the small sample size. The study also found that two different blood-thinning strategies used during stent placement — a dual oral antiplatelet regimen versus an intravenous drug called tirofiban — appeared similarly safe and effective, though again the numbers were too small to draw firm conclusions. This research suggests that stent-assisted coiling may offer better long-term sealing of ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysms compared to coiling alone, but comes with a higher risk of clot-related complications during treatment. Because the study included only 29 patients and was retrospective (looking back at existing records rather than running a controlled trial), the authors emphasize that the findings are exploratory and need to be confirmed in larger, prospective studies before firm clinical guidance can be established.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

He L, Zhu W, Liu Y, Huang Y. (2026). Stent-assisted coiling for ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: A retrospective observational study evaluating safety, efficacy, and antiplatelet strategies.. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000050421