Cardiovascular

Stroke Caregiver Education and Training in an Inpatient Sub-Acute Setting: A Retrospective Clinical Audit.

TL;DR

In a retrospective audit of 109 stroke admissions to an inpatient subacute neurosciences ward, caregiver education and training (CGET) documentation was inconsistent across disciplines and domains, and the authors conclude that multidisciplinary CGET provision and documentation needs to be consistent, particularly for cognition, continence, mobility and activities of daily living.

Key Findings

The audit of 109 stroke admissions identified 1398 documented episodes of caregiver education and training (CGET).

  • Retrospective clinical audit on an inpatient subacute neurosciences ward.
  • Data were collected with a purpose-built audit tool covering demographics, admission and discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, and multidisciplinary team CGET.
  • Analysis was descriptive with sub-group comparison against Stroke Guideline recommendations.

Social work and occupational therapy documented CGET more consistently than other disciplines.

  • Social work documented CGET for 79.9% of records.
  • Occupational therapy documented CGET for 77.1% of records.
  • Other disciplines were documented less consistently.

CGET was significantly more likely to be documented for patients with cognitive impairment.

  • The abstract reports the association as statistically significant.
  • The abstract does not give the specific test statistic or p-value.

Few patients with memory impairment had documented CGET on memory strategies.

  • Only 3 of 28 individuals (10.7%) with memory impairment had CGET relating to memory strategies documented.
  • This occurred even though CGET overall was more likely to be documented for patients with cognitive impairment.

Nursing staff documented minimal CGET across all domains, including continence management.

  • Minimal nursing CGET documentation was found across all domains.
  • Continence management was specifically highlighted as a domain with little nursing documentation.

Documented CGET on stroke recovery relating to activities of daily living, mobility and cognition was inconsistent.

  • Inconsistency was seen across these three domains.
  • The findings were explored against Stroke Guideline recommendations.

Variable documentation practices made the audit data difficult to interpret.

  • The authors note that variable documentation practices highlighted challenges with interpretation.
  • The audit cannot determine whether patients' functional limitations were matched with appropriate CGET; further research is needed.

The authors conclude that multidisciplinary CGET provision and documentation needs to be consistent, particularly for cognition, continence, mobility and activities of daily living.

  • Background: caregiver burden is significant post-stroke and caregivers have unmet needs throughout rehabilitation.
  • There is limited literature detailing CGET provision before discharge.

What This Means

This study reviewed the medical records of 109 people admitted after a stroke to a subacute rehabilitation ward, looking at how well staff documented education and training given to family members or other caregivers. Caring for someone after a stroke is demanding, and caregivers often report unmet needs, so preparing them before the patient goes home is considered important. The records showed 1398 documented instances of caregiver education and training. Social workers (79.9%) and occupational therapists (77.1%) documented it most often. Nurses documented very little, including on bladder and bowel management. Training was more often recorded for patients with thinking or cognitive problems, but only 3 of 28 patients with memory problems had caregiver training on memory strategies recorded. Documentation on daily living tasks, mobility and cognition was also patchy. This research suggests that caregiver training after stroke may not be delivered or recorded consistently across the care team, especially for cognition, continence, mobility and daily activities. Because this was a review of records, it cannot show whether training was actually missing or simply not written down, nor whether training matched each patient's needs. The authors call for more consistent practice and further research.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

McCarthy M, Baker N, Selenitsch N, den Berg M. (2026). Stroke Caregiver Education and Training in an Inpatient Sub-Acute Setting: A Retrospective Clinical Audit.. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70690