Exercise & Training

Tailored profiles of physical activity in children with asthma: Insights from a mixed methods study.

TL;DR

Four distinct physical activity profiles were identified in children with asthma, shaped by interacting physiological, psychological, and family processes rather than disease severity alone, suggesting that support strategies may need to be tailored to profile-specific behavioral and family mechanisms.

Key Findings

Four distinct physical activity profiles were identified among children with asthma using person-centered profile modeling.

  • Study recruited 243 children with asthma aged 6-17 years from respiratory outpatient clinics of two tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China between March 2024 and February 2025
  • Profiles were named Fearful Avoiders (14.4%), Unsupported Potentials (15.6%), Struggling Strivers (21.4%), and Supported Thrivers (48.6%)
  • Profiles differed on measures of physical activity, asthma control, breathlessness-related fear, perceived physical competence, and parental activity support
  • An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used, combining quantitative profile modeling with qualitative semi-structured interviews

Profile 1, Fearful Avoiders (14.4%), showed the lowest physical activity levels, poorest asthma control, highest symptom fear, and lowest perceived physical competence.

  • This profile represented 14.4% of the 243-child sample
  • Qualitative findings from child-parent dyad interviews suggested 'a self-reinforcing cycle of fear, avoidance, and reduced confidence'
  • 4 child-parent dyads from this profile were selected for semi-structured interviews conducted between June and September 2025
  • This profile had the most unfavorable combination of psychological and behavioral outcomes among the four profiles

Profile 2, Unsupported Potentials (15.6%), showed predominantly moderate activity and the lowest parental support, with predominantly partial asthma control.

  • This profile represented 15.6% of the sample
  • Qualitative interviews suggested that 'symptom stability was often interpreted as good enough, leading families to disengage from active lifestyle support'
  • Despite having predominantly partial asthma control, families in this profile were not actively engaged in supporting physical activity
  • 4 child-parent dyads from this profile were selected for qualitative interviews

Profile 3, Struggling Strivers (21.4%), maintained moderate activity despite elevated symptom fear and intermediate psychosocial outcomes, often under external pressure rather than genuine confidence.

  • This profile represented 21.4% of the sample
  • Qualitative data suggested that 'activity was often sustained under peer and family pressure rather than through genuine confidence'
  • This profile illustrates that similar activity levels to other profiles may reflect very different underlying mechanisms
  • Elevated symptom fear coexisted with continued moderate physical activity engagement

Profile 4, Supported Thrivers (48.6%), demonstrated the most favorable pattern with higher activity, better asthma control, lower fear, stronger perceived competence, and greater parental support.

  • This was the largest profile, representing nearly half (48.6%) of the sample
  • This profile had the most favorable combination across all measured dimensions including physical activity, asthma control, breathlessness-related fear, perceived physical competence, and parental support
  • This profile represented an adaptive self-management pattern as distinguished from the fear-driven or disengaged patterns seen in other profiles
  • 4 child-parent dyads from this profile were selected for qualitative interviews

External validation confirmed significant between-profile differences in depression, anxiety, quality of life, and exercise adherence.

  • All between-profile differences in depression, anxiety, quality of life, and exercise adherence were statistically significant (all p < .001)
  • These variables were used as external validators to support the clinical relevance of the profiles
  • Significant differences across all four external validators support that the profiles represent clinically meaningful distinctions
  • The validation reinforces that the profiles capture real differences in child health outcomes beyond the variables used to construct them

Similar levels of physical activity among children with asthma may reflect very different underlying mechanisms including disengagement, fear-driven persistence, or adaptive self-management.

  • The study used joint display analysis to integrate quantitative patterns with lived experiences from 16 child-parent dyads (4 per profile)
  • Qualitative interviews revealed that moderate activity in Profile 2 (Unsupported Potentials) was driven by disengagement, while moderate activity in Profile 3 (Struggling Strivers) was driven by external pressure
  • This finding challenges approaches that assess physical activity in pediatric asthma based on activity level or disease severity alone
  • The authors conclude that 'physical activity participation in children with asthma appears to be shaped by interacting physiological, psychological, and family processes rather than by disease severity alone'

Parental support was identified as a key differentiating factor across physical activity profiles in children with asthma.

  • Parental activity support was one of the core measures used to construct profiles alongside physical activity, asthma control, breathlessness-related fear, and perceived physical competence
  • The Unsupported Potentials profile had the lowest parental support among all profiles
  • The Supported Thrivers profile had the greatest parental support and the most favorable outcomes
  • Qualitative interviews with child-parent dyads were used to explore family processes underlying each profile

What This Means

This research suggests that children with asthma do not all relate to physical activity in the same way, and that how active a child is cannot simply be explained by how severe their asthma is. By studying 243 children in China and interviewing 16 child-parent pairs, researchers identified four distinct groups: children who avoided activity out of fear, children with moderate activity but little family support, children who stayed active mainly due to social pressure rather than confidence, and children who thrived with strong family support and positive attitudes. Crucially, two groups had similar moderate activity levels but for completely different reasons — one because families had given up trying, and another because children felt pressured by peers and family rather than genuinely empowered. The four groups differed significantly not just in physical activity, but also in depression, anxiety, quality of life, and how consistently they exercised (all differences were statistically significant). This means the groups represent real and meaningful differences in children's health and wellbeing, not just patterns in activity data. The findings highlight that breathlessness-related fear and parental engagement are important factors shaping whether and how children with asthma participate in physical activity. This research suggests that one-size-fits-all advice about physical activity for children with asthma may not be enough. A child who avoids activity due to fear needs different support than a child who is active but only because of pressure, or one whose family has disengaged because symptoms seem 'good enough.' Tailoring support to each child's specific psychological and family situation — rather than focusing only on asthma severity or activity levels — may be more effective in helping children with asthma lead active, healthy lives.

Check Your Own Numbers

Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.

Upload Your Labs

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Lin N, Sun Y, Jin J, Lai D, Chen Z, Xu H. (2026). Tailored profiles of physical activity in children with asthma: Insights from a mixed methods study.. International journal of nursing studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105575