Cardiovascular

Teclistamab-associated adverse events: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

TL;DR

Among 2,631 FAERS reports for teclistamab, 85.2% involved serious outcomes and 21.7% fatal outcomes, with 70 significant adverse event signals identified including 18 novel signals, and sepsis emerging as the sole high-priority signal with fatal outcomes in 58.57% of sepsis-related reports.

Key Findings

Teclistamab-associated adverse event reports showed a high burden of serious and fatal outcomes in real-world post-marketing data.

  • A total of 2,631 FAERS reports were analyzed from 2022 to 2025.
  • 85.2% of reports involved serious outcomes.
  • 21.7% of reports involved fatal outcomes.
  • Four disproportionality methods were used: reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker.

The most frequently reported system organ class in teclistamab adverse event reports was infections and infestations.

  • Infections and infestations represented the top system organ class among reported adverse events.
  • Cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, infection, pneumonia, pyrexia, and neutropenia were among the most frequently reported preferred-term signals.
  • This finding highlights the predominance of infectious complications in the real-world safety profile of teclistamab.

Seventy significant preferred-term adverse event signals were identified, including 18 novel signals not previously documented in clinical trials.

  • Of the 70 significant signals, 52 were previously documented and 18 were novel.
  • The identification of novel signals suggests that post-marketing surveillance captures additional safety information beyond clinical trial data.
  • The safety profile broadly aligned with clinical trial data but the novel signals highlighted clinically important risks.

Sepsis was identified as the sole high-priority adverse event signal, with a majority of sepsis-related reports resulting in fatal outcomes.

  • Sepsis was the only signal classified as high-priority using semi-quantitative clinical prioritization analysis.
  • Fatal outcomes occurred in 58.57% of sepsis-related reports.
  • This finding underscores sepsis as a particularly dangerous complication associated with teclistamab use.

Immune-related and neurological adverse events occurred earlier in the course of teclistamab treatment, whereas infectious complications tended to occur later.

  • Time-to-onset analysis using Weibull and Kaplan-Meier methods characterized temporal patterns of adverse events.
  • Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome and cytokine release syndrome were among the earlier-occurring events.
  • Infectious complications, including pneumonia and sepsis, demonstrated a tendency toward later onset.
  • This temporal differentiation has implications for clinical monitoring schedules.

Safety profiles were generally consistent across sex and age groups, with the exception that septic shock was less frequently reported in females.

  • Subgroup analyses by sex and age showed broadly consistent adverse event patterns.
  • Septic shock was identified as an exception, being less frequently reported in female patients.
  • No other major sex- or age-related differences in safety signals were highlighted.

The study identified that targeted risk mitigation and continued monitoring are supported particularly for severe infections and immune-related toxicities.

  • The findings support the need for targeted risk mitigation strategies based on the temporal patterns and severity of identified signals.
  • Novel signals and sepsis-related fatality were highlighted as clinically important risks beyond those characterized in clinical trials.
  • The authors conclude that continued pharmacovigilance is warranted for teclistamab in the post-marketing setting.

What This Means

This research analyzed reports of side effects from teclistamab — a newer immunotherapy drug used for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (a type of blood cancer) — submitted to the FDA's adverse event reporting system between 2022 and 2025. The researchers examined 2,631 reports and used multiple statistical methods to identify which side effects were reported more often than would be expected by chance. They found that the vast majority of reported side effects were serious (85.2%), and more than one in five reports (21.7%) were associated with death, painting a concerning picture of the real-world safety profile of this drug. The most common types of side effects involved infections, with cytokine release syndrome (an overreaction of the immune system), neurological toxicity, pneumonia, fever, and low white blood cell counts also frequently reported. Seventy statistically significant safety signals were identified, including 18 that had not been previously described in clinical trial data. Most notably, sepsis (a life-threatening response to infection) emerged as the only 'high-priority' safety signal, and more than half of patients (58.57%) who developed sepsis died. The timing of side effects also differed: immune and neurological reactions tended to appear earlier during treatment, while infectious complications appeared later, which could guide when patients should be monitored most closely. This research suggests that while teclistamab's safety profile is broadly consistent with what was seen in clinical trials, real-world use reveals additional risks — particularly severe infections and sepsis — that may not have been fully captured in controlled study settings. The findings highlight the importance of careful monitoring for infections throughout treatment, especially later in the course of therapy, and suggest that strategies to prevent and rapidly treat serious infections may be particularly important for patients receiving this drug.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

He X, Chen G, Zhan Z, Li Z. (2026). Teclistamab-associated adverse events: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.. Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2026.2730041