Cardiovascular

The changing landscape of Fabry disease: Impact of the inclusion of the GLA-gene in broader NGS or WES based panels on the phenotypic spectrum.

TL;DR

The introduction of broader DNA sequencing techniques results in the identification of a higher proportion of individuals with less deleterious GLA variants and consequently a milder clinical phenotype, requiring tailored genetic counseling and clinical follow-up to prevent both over- and undertreatment.

Key Findings

The Dutch Fabry cohort contains 319 patients with 64 different GLA variants, confirming that Fabry disease is a genetically heterogeneous disorder.

  • 64 distinct GLA variants were identified across the cohort of 319 patients
  • The cohort represents the Dutch Fabry patient population analyzed over time
  • Genetic heterogeneity was a consistent feature across different diagnostic eras

Introduction of broader NGS or WES based panels led to identification of a higher proportion of patients with less deleterious GLA variants and milder clinical phenotypes.

  • Broader DNA sequencing techniques were applied to a broader range of individuals with less specific symptoms
  • The shift toward milder variants reflects the inclusion of the GLA-gene in wider sequencing panels
  • This contrasts with earlier diagnostic approaches that typically identified patients with classical, more severe phenotypes

For the majority of individuals identified through broader sequencing techniques, cardiomyopathy is the presenting and only symptom of the disorder.

  • This single-organ presentation contrasts sharply with the multisystem classical Fabry disease phenotype
  • Classical Fabry disease involves multiple organ systems, whereas newer-identified patients predominantly present with isolated cardiomyopathy
  • The non-classical phenotype was the predominant finding among patients diagnosed via broader sequencing panels

The composition of the Dutch Fabry cohort shifted over time as broader sequencing techniques were introduced, reflecting changes in how and in whom Fabry disease is diagnosed.

  • The study analyzed changes in cohort composition over time to assess the impact of diagnostic method evolution
  • Earlier cohorts were enriched for classical FD phenotype; newer diagnostic approaches identified more non-classical cases
  • The phenotypic shift was attributed specifically to the addition of the GLA-gene to NGS or WES based panels

The phenotypic shift in newly diagnosed Fabry disease patients has important implications for the interpretation of historical clinical and treatment effect data.

  • Comparing current to historical clinical data is complicated by the changing phenotypic spectrum of diagnosed patients
  • Tailored genetic counseling and clinical follow-up are required for patients identified through broader sequencing
  • The authors specifically warn that this shift requires measures to prevent both over- and undertreatment

What This Means

Fabry disease is an inherited metabolic disorder caused by mutations in the GLA gene, which can cause a wide range of symptoms from severe multi-organ disease to milder, more limited forms. This Dutch study examined how the introduction of broader genetic testing methods — specifically next-generation sequencing (NGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) panels that now include the GLA gene — has changed the types of patients being diagnosed with Fabry disease over time. By analyzing a cohort of 319 Dutch patients carrying 64 different GLA gene variants, the researchers found that modern sequencing approaches are identifying more people with milder, less damaging gene variants who predominantly have only heart muscle disease (cardiomyopathy), rather than the classic form of Fabry disease which affects multiple organ systems including the kidneys, nervous system, and skin. This research suggests that the profile of a 'typical' Fabry disease patient is changing not because the disease itself is changing, but because genetic testing is now being applied more broadly to people with less specific or less severe symptoms. The result is that a growing proportion of newly diagnosed individuals have a much milder form of the disease, often with heart involvement as their only symptom. This is a fundamentally different population from those historically diagnosed with Fabry disease, who tended to have the severe, classical multi-system form. The practical implications are significant: doctors and researchers can no longer straightforwardly compare today's patient outcomes or treatment responses to historical data, since the two groups may not be comparable. The findings also highlight the need for personalized genetic counseling and careful clinical monitoring for newly identified patients, to ensure they receive appropriate care — neither being undertreated if their condition is truly progressive, nor overtreated if their variant causes only minimal disease. This balance is especially important as Fabry disease has available but costly and burdensome enzyme replacement therapies.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

van Dussen L, Albers E, van der Crabben S, Lekanne Deprez R, Plomp A, Langeveld M. (2026). The changing landscape of Fabry disease: Impact of the inclusion of the GLA-gene in broader NGS or WES based panels on the phenotypic spectrum.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358572