30-seconds of static stretching elicited greater moderate magnitude ROM improvements in the stretched limb compared to control, but failed to produce any significant effects on the contralateral leg and shoulder, while all conditions including control experienced MVIC force decreases.
Key Findings
Results
Static stretching produced significant moderate magnitude ROM improvements in the stretched limb compared to control.
30-seconds of static stretching (SS) elicited greater ROM improvements in the stretched limb (p < 0.001, 8.1%) compared to control
The magnitude of improvement was characterized as moderate
Passive hip flexion ROM was among the measures assessed pre- and post-intervention
14 participants were involved in a within-subjects, repeated-measures design
Results
Static stretching showed non-significant ROM gains in the contralateral (non-stretched) leg, suggesting possible crossover effects in some individuals.
Non-significant (p = 0.08) SS-induced ROM gains were observed in the contralateral leg
The authors inferred 'the possibility of crossover effects in some individuals'
The crossover or non-local effect did not reach statistical significance at the group level
Non-local ROM was one of the primary outcomes of interest in this study
Results
No stretching intervention produced significant ROM improvements in the non-local shoulder.
There were no significant effects on the shoulder with any intervention (static, PNF, or dynamic stretching)
Passive shoulder extension ROM was assessed as a non-local outcome measure
The four conditions tested were: static stretching (SS), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), dynamic stretching (DS), and a no-stretch control
The study concluded that 30-seconds 'failed to produce any significant effects on the contralateral leg and shoulder'
Results
All conditions, including the no-stretch control, experienced significant decreases in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force of the stretched limb.
All conditions including control experienced MVIC force decreases with the stretched limb (p = 0.007)
Knee flexor and right shoulder extension MVIC force were measured pre- and post-intervention
The occurrence of force decreases in the control condition suggests that the decline may not be solely attributable to stretching
The authors noted that passive ROM improvements 'can be accompanied by declines in MVIC force'
Results
No significant differences in pain pressure thresholds (PPT) were found across any stretching condition.
There were no significant PPT interactions across any of the four conditions
Pain pressure thresholds were used as a measure of pain sensitivity/onset
PPT was assessed pre- and post-intervention alongside ROM, MVIC, and EMG measures
This finding indicates that a single 30-second stretching bout did not alter pain sensitivity
Results
Sex-based differences were observed, with women demonstrating greater ROM and men exhibiting greater force, EMG activity, and fatigue indices.
Women demonstrated greater ROM compared to men
Men exhibited greater MVIC force, EMG activity, and fatigue indices compared to women
Muscle activation was measured via electromyography (EMG)
A 30-second MVIC fatigue index was among the outcome measures assessed
The sample consisted of 14 participants in a within-subjects design
What This Means
This research suggests that a single 30-second bout of static stretching can meaningfully improve flexibility in the muscle being stretched, producing about an 8% increase in range of motion compared to doing nothing. However, the same stretching did not significantly improve flexibility in the opposite (unstretched) leg or in a distant body part like the shoulder, suggesting that the 'crossover' or 'remote' flexibility benefits sometimes reported in the literature may not reliably occur from such a short stretching duration. There was a hint that some individuals might experience crossover effects in the contralateral leg, but this did not reach statistical significance at the group level.
A notable finding was that strength (measured as maximum force output) declined after the stretching period — but this also happened in the control condition where no stretching was performed. This suggests the strength decrease may be partly explained by factors like fatigue from repeated testing rather than stretching alone. Pain sensitivity was not significantly changed by any type of stretching. The study also found that women tended to be more flexible while men produced more force and showed greater muscle electrical activity.
This research suggests that while 30 seconds of static stretching is enough to improve local flexibility, it may not be sufficient to produce widespread flexibility benefits across the body or to reduce pain sensitivity. Those hoping to improve flexibility in multiple areas of the body may need to stretch each area individually, and athletes concerned about strength should be aware that even brief stretching sessions may coincide with temporary reductions in force production.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Parsons H, Behm D. (2026). The effects of dynamic, static, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on local & non-local range of motion and pain onset.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358885