Dietary Supplements

The Effects of Interval Resistance-Aerobic Training and Fisetin Supplementation on Asprosin and Selected Adipokines in Obese Men: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial.

TL;DR

12 weeks of combined interval resistance-aerobic training and fisetin supplementation significantly reduced pro-inflammatory adipokines (asprosin -60.71%, MCP-1 -46.50%) and improved lipid profiles in obese men, with the combined training plus fisetin group achieving the most substantial effects.

Key Findings

The training plus fisetin (TF) group achieved the greatest reductions in asprosin levels among all groups.

  • Interventions exerted a highly significant effect on asprosin: F(3, 55) = 36.047, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.663
  • The TF group experienced a -60.71% reduction in asprosin levels
  • Analysis was conducted via ANCOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests following intention-to-treat (ITT) principles
  • 60 sedentary obese men (BMI < 30 kg/m2) were randomized across four groups: placebo (P), fisetin (F), training-placebo (TP), and training plus fisetin (TF)

The training plus fisetin (TF) group achieved the greatest reductions in MCP-1 levels among all groups.

  • Interventions exerted a highly significant effect on MCP-1: F(3, 55) = 29.570, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.617
  • The TF group experienced a -46.50% reduction in MCP-1 levels
  • MCP-1 was identified as a primary outcome measure alongside asprosin and adiponectin

Adiponectin levels increased significantly in both the training-placebo and training plus fisetin groups.

  • Significant increases in adiponectin were observed in the TP group (29.38%) and TF group (27.67%), both p < 0.05
  • Adiponectin was a primary outcome measure in the study
  • The fisetin-only (F) group results for adiponectin were not reported as statistically significant

Leptin changes were statistically significant only in the training plus fisetin group relative to the placebo group.

  • Changes in leptin were statistically significant only in the TF group relative to placebo (p = 0.049)
  • Leptin was a secondary outcome measure
  • The TP and F groups did not show statistically significant changes in leptin compared to placebo

Body weight was significantly reduced in the TF, TP, and fisetin groups compared to the placebo group.

  • Significant difference in mean body weight was observed between groups: F(3, 55) = 9.444, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.340
  • Bonferroni post hoc tests confirmed that TF, TP, and F groups all achieved significant weight loss compared to placebo
  • BMI showed a significant inter-group difference (p = 0.021), but only the TF group reached statistically significant BMI reduction compared to placebo (p = 0.024; 95% CI [-3.760, -0.172])

The training plus fisetin group demonstrated significant improvements in all lipid profile markers, while the placebo group experienced deterioration.

  • The TF group achieved statistically significant reductions in LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC) (p < 0.001) and a significant elevation in HDL-C
  • Post hoc analyses confirmed robust statistical differences in all lipid parameters for both TF and TP groups compared to placebo (p < 0.05)
  • The placebo group experienced deterioration characterized by a significant increase in LDL-C (p = 0.027) and a significant decline in HDL-C concentrations (p = 0.006)
  • Lipid profile was a secondary outcome measure

The study employed a 12-week interval resistance plus progressive aerobic training protocol combined with 200 mg/day fisetin supplementation.

  • Training consisted of thrice-weekly interval resistance training: eight exercises, 3 × 13 reps at 60% 1RM with 20% 1RM active rest
  • Resistance training was immediately followed by staged aerobic bouts at 50-70% HRmax
  • Fisetin supplementation dose was 200 mg/day over 12 weeks
  • The study was a double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with 60 sedentary obese men
  • Four groups were used: control-placebo (P), fisetin (F), training-placebo (TP), and training plus fisetin (TF)

The authors identify asprosin as a potential modulator in metabolic risk reduction, while acknowledging that direct mechanistic assays were not conducted.

  • The paper states these implications 'remain hypothetical' since 'direct mechanistic assays were not conducted'
  • The authors call for 'future research employing molecular readouts to confirm the underlying pathways involved'
  • Asprosin had the largest effect size among the primary outcomes (ηp2 = 0.663)

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Alipour M, Saeidi A, Hejazi K, Supriya R, Zouhal H. (2026). The Effects of Interval Resistance-Aerobic Training and Fisetin Supplementation on Asprosin and Selected Adipokines in Obese Men: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial.. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030433