Mental Health

The hidden curriculum of endurance: how students' psychosocial stress becomes normalised in arts higher education.

TL;DR

A hidden curriculum of endurance emerged in Czech arts higher education through which exhaustion, uncertainty, and self-sacrifice became normalised as part of becoming an artist, with psychosocial stressors identified as socially and institutionally produced across institutional, organisational, and interpersonal categories.

Key Findings

Three major categories of psychosocial stressors were identified in arts higher education: institutional, organisational, and interpersonal.

  • The study was based on 30 semi-structured interviews with students enrolled in visual, audiovisual, and performing arts programmes in Czech arts higher education.
  • Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
  • Institutional stressors included norms of total commitment, meritocratic constructions of success, and pressure to accumulate social capital.
  • Organisational stressors involved intensive time demands, ambiguous and subjective evaluation practices, and emotionally demanding Final Critiques.
  • Interpersonal stressors involved blurred student-teacher boundaries, intergenerational tensions, and competitive peer dynamics.

A 'hidden curriculum of endurance' emerged across all stressor categories through which exhaustion, uncertainty, and self-sacrifice became normalised as part of becoming an artist.

  • The hidden curriculum was identified as a cross-cutting theme spanning institutional, organisational, and interpersonal stressors.
  • The normalisation process was embedded in the everyday conditions of artistic training rather than being explicitly taught.
  • This pattern reflects a broader cultural construction of what it means to become an artist in the context of arts higher education.

Arts students in higher education may be especially vulnerable to psychosocial distress, yet their well-being remains underexamined in the literature.

  • The deterioration of university students' mental health is described as a global public health concern.
  • Despite evidence of heightened vulnerability among arts students, this population has received insufficient research attention.
  • The study was conducted in Czech arts higher education, representing a specific national and institutional context.

Psychosocial stressors in arts higher education were found to be socially and institutionally produced rather than individual in origin.

  • The authors frame stressors as embedded in organisational cultures, pedagogical practices, and relational dynamics.
  • Institutional norms and structures were identified as key mechanisms through which stress is produced and normalised.
  • This framing positions the source of distress at the systemic level rather than attributing it to individual student vulnerability.

The authors conclude that effective responses to psychosocial stress in arts higher education should address organisational cultures, pedagogical practices, and relational dynamics.

  • The recommendation moves beyond individual-level mental health interventions.
  • Addressing ambiguous and subjective evaluation practices, such as emotionally demanding Final Critiques, is highlighted as important.
  • Blurred student-teacher boundaries and competitive peer dynamics are identified as relational factors requiring institutional attention.

What This Means

This research suggests that students studying arts subjects at university — including visual arts, film, and performing arts — face a distinctive and largely unacknowledged set of pressures that go beyond typical academic stress. By interviewing 30 arts students in Czech higher education, the researchers identified three broad types of stressors: those built into the institution's culture (like expectations of total dedication to one's art and a 'sink or swim' approach to success), those built into how courses are organised (like unclear grading, heavy time demands, and high-stakes public critiques of student work), and those arising from relationships (like blurry boundaries between students and teachers, tension between generations, and competition among peers). A key finding was what the researchers call a 'hidden curriculum of endurance' — an unspoken set of lessons that arts students absorb about what it means to be a 'real' artist. This hidden curriculum teaches students that exhaustion, self-sacrifice, and uncertainty are normal and even necessary parts of artistic development, even though these expectations are never explicitly stated. This research suggests that these pressures are not simply personal struggles but are actively produced by the systems and cultures within arts institutions themselves. The practical implication of this research is that simply offering counselling or mental health support to individual students may not be enough. Because the stress originates in institutional structures, teaching practices, and social dynamics, meaningful change would require arts schools to critically examine and reform their organisational cultures, how they evaluate students, and how they manage the relationships between students and teachers.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Procházková B, Zábrodská K. (2026). The hidden curriculum of endurance: how students' psychosocial stress becomes normalised in arts higher education.. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2026.2727777