The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wan W, Shen L, Chang Y, Jin X • Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer • 2026
Prehabilitation reduces early incontinence and improves QoL post-RP, but its effects on severity and erectile function remain unclear.
Key Findings
Results
Prehabilitation significantly reduced the incidence of urinary incontinence at 1 month and 6 months after radical prostatectomy.
At 1 month postoperatively: OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.84
At 6 months postoperatively: OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.96
A non-significant borderline reduction was observed at 3 months
No significant benefit was found at 12 months postoperatively
Analysis was based on 16 RCTs involving 1,542 participants
Results
Prehabilitation did not significantly improve urinary incontinence severity at any postoperative follow-up time point.
No significant improvement in urinary incontinence severity was observed at any follow-up time point examined
This finding applied across all measured postoperative time points (1, 3, 6, and 12 months)
The analysis was conducted using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity
Risk of bias was assessed as generally moderate using the RoB-2 tool
Results
Prehabilitation did not significantly improve erectile function at any postoperative follow-up time point.
No significant improvement in erectile function was observed at any follow-up time point
The authors noted that the effects on erectile function 'remain unclear'
Data were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL databases
Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment
Results
Prehabilitation significantly improved quality of life within 3 months and 6 months after radical prostatectomy.
Within 3 months postoperatively: SMD = -0.70, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.32
At 6 months postoperatively: SMD = -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.16
Within 12 months, the effect size attenuated to SMD = -0.33, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.00, which did not reach statistical significance
The 12-month result was described as 'only a marginal trend that did not reach statistical significance'
Methods
The systematic review and meta-analysis included 16 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1,542 participants.
Data were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL databases
Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool and was 'generally moderate'
Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 18.0 software
The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251183407)
Outcomes included urinary incontinence incidence, urinary incontinence severity, erectile function, and QoL at different postoperative follow-up time points
What This Means
This research synthesized results from 16 randomized controlled trials involving over 1,500 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (surgical removal of the prostate) for prostate cancer to determine whether prehabilitation — structured exercise or rehabilitation training completed before surgery — improves recovery outcomes. The study found that men who completed prehabilitation programs were significantly less likely to experience urinary incontinence (involuntary urine leakage) in the first month and at six months after surgery compared to those who did not. Prehabilitation also led to meaningfully better quality of life scores in the first three to six months following surgery. However, these benefits appeared to fade over time, with no statistically significant differences detected at the one-year mark.
Despite the encouraging findings for early urinary control and quality of life, prehabilitation did not produce measurable improvements in how severe urinary incontinence was when it did occur, nor did it improve erectile function at any time point examined. The authors noted that the overall quality of the included studies was moderate, meaning the true effects could differ somewhat from what was measured. The pattern of results suggests that prehabilitation may help men recover more quickly in the short term, even if long-term outcomes ultimately converge between groups.
This research suggests that incorporating structured prehabilitation programs before radical prostatectomy may offer meaningful short-term benefits for patients — particularly in reducing early urinary leakage and supporting quality of life during the initial recovery period. However, questions remain about which specific types of prehabilitation are most effective, why benefits appear to diminish by one year, and how to address erectile function recovery. Future research with larger, more standardized trials would help clarify these remaining uncertainties.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Wan W, Shen L, Chang Y, Jin X. (2026). The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11182-z