Sexual Health

The relative importance of socio-ecological factors in regard to psychosexual health among adolescent students: based on dominance analysis.

TL;DR

Dominance analysis revealed that peer relationship (36.1%) and parent-adolescent communication about sex (34.2%) were the most important socio-ecological factors influencing psychosexual health among secondary vocational school students, followed by general self-efficacy (14.5%), sexual refusal self-efficacy (9.6%), and parental monitoring (5.9%).

Key Findings

Peer relationship was the most important socio-ecological factor influencing psychosexual health among secondary vocational school students.

  • Peer relationship contributed 36.1% to the explanation of psychosexual health variance in the dominance analysis.
  • It ranked first among all five socio-ecological factors examined.
  • Sample consisted of 2895 secondary vocational school students from Shandong province, China.
  • Peer relationship was measured using the Peer Relationship Scale.

Parent-adolescent communication about sex was the second most important factor influencing psychosexual health.

  • Parent-adolescent communication about sex contributed 34.2% to the explanation of psychosexual health variance.
  • It was measured using the Parent-Teen Communication about Sex Questionnaire.
  • Its contribution was closely comparable to that of peer relationship (36.1%), making these two factors the dominant predictors.

General self-efficacy was the third most important factor influencing psychosexual health.

  • General self-efficacy contributed 14.5% to the explanation of psychosexual health variance.
  • It was measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale.
  • Its contribution was substantially lower than the top two social factors but higher than the remaining two predictors.

Sexual refusal self-efficacy contributed less to psychosexual health than general self-efficacy but more than parental monitoring.

  • Sexual refusal self-efficacy contributed 9.6% to the explanation of psychosexual health variance.
  • It ranked fourth among the five socio-ecological factors.
  • It was measured using the Sexual Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.

Parental monitoring was the least important socio-ecological factor influencing psychosexual health in this sample.

  • Parental monitoring contributed 5.9% to the explanation of psychosexual health variance.
  • It ranked last among all five socio-ecological factors examined.
  • It was measured using the Parental Monitoring Questionnaire.

The study used dominance analysis to rank the relative importance of multiple socio-ecological predictors of psychosexual health simultaneously.

  • Dominance analysis was selected as the statistical method to determine the relative contribution of each predictor.
  • Eight validated scales were administered: General Self-Efficacy Scale, Sexual Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Peer Relationship Scale, Parental Monitoring Questionnaire, Parent-Teen Communication about Sex Questionnaire, School Connectedness Scale, School Sex Education Questionnaire, and High School Student Psychosexual Health Scale.
  • Total sample size was 2895 secondary vocational school students from Shandong province, China.
  • Psychosexual health was defined as 'an individual's capacity to acquire sexual knowledge through appropriate means, develop healthy values, accept bodily changes, align with socio-cultural norms and regulate sexual behaviors.'

What This Means

This research surveyed nearly 2,900 students at secondary vocational schools in Shandong province, China, to understand which social and personal factors matter most for adolescents' psychosexual health — defined as having appropriate sexual knowledge, healthy values, acceptance of bodily changes, and the ability to regulate sexual behavior in ways consistent with social norms. The researchers measured five key factors: peer relationships, parent-teen communication about sex, general self-confidence (self-efficacy), the ability to refuse unwanted sexual advances (sexual refusal self-efficacy), and how closely parents monitor their children's activities. They used a statistical technique called dominance analysis to rank how much each factor contributed to psychosexual health. The results showed that the quality of peer relationships was the single most important factor, accounting for about 36% of the influence on psychosexual health, followed closely by how openly parents and teens communicate about sex (34%). General self-efficacy contributed about 15%, sexual refusal self-efficacy about 10%, and parental monitoring about 6%. Together, peer and family communication factors dominated, accounting for more than 70% of the combined influence. This research suggests that efforts to improve adolescent psychosexual health should prioritize helping young people build positive peer relationships and encouraging open, constructive conversations between parents and teens about sex. Building adolescents' general confidence and their specific ability to refuse unwanted sexual situations also appear meaningful, while parental monitoring alone plays a comparatively smaller role. These findings may be particularly relevant for secondary vocational school populations, who are a distinct group within the Chinese education system and may have different support structures than students in traditional academic high schools.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Fang X, Zhang M, Yang M, Liu W, Dong L, Ren Y, et al.. (2025). The relative importance of socio-ecological factors in regard to psychosexual health among adolescent students: based on dominance analysis.. Sexual health. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25001