Mental Health

The Role of Stress and Resilience Profiles in Emotional Health.

TL;DR

Latent profile analysis of 329 adults identified three stress-resilience profiles (low stress/high resilience, high proximal stress/low resilience, high distal stress/moderate resilience) that were differentially associated with emotion regulation and emotionality stigma.

Key Findings

Latent profile analysis identified three distinct subgroups based on the co-occurrence of distal stress, proximal stress, and resilience.

  • Sample was 329 adults (Mage = 37.83, SDage = 11.86) recruited through an online recruitment system.
  • Profile 1: low stress, high resilience.
  • Profile 2: high proximal stress, low resilience.
  • Profile 3: high distal stress, moderate resilience.
  • Stress measures included past trauma, subjective social status, and perceived stress (distal and proximal stressors).

The high proximal stress, low resilience profile reported significantly lower emotion regulation than the other two profiles.

  • The comparison was against both the low stress, high resilience profile and the high distal stress, moderate resilience profile.
  • Profiles were mapped onto emotion regulation as an outcome emotion process.
  • The abstract reports the difference as significant but gives no effect sizes.

Both higher-stress profiles reported significantly greater emotionality stigma than the low stress, high resilience profile.

  • The high proximal stress/low resilience and high distal stress/moderate resilience profiles both differed from the low stress/high resilience profile.
  • Emotionality stigma was one of two emotion processes examined, along with emotion regulation.

Distal stress, proximal stress, and resilience co-occur in patterned ways, and the stress profiles differ in their links to emotion processes.

  • The study aimed to address limited research on how stress and resilience co-occur and shape emotion processes.
  • The high distal stress profile had moderate resilience, while the high proximal stress profile had low resilience.

The sample was predominantly non-Hispanic, White, and lower-income.

  • 90.2% identified as non-Hispanic and 77.8% as White.
  • 52.8% reported a household income below $55,000.
  • Participants self-reported all measures.

What This Means

This study asked how different kinds of stress and personal resilience tend to occur together in people's lives, and how these combinations relate to the way people handle emotions. Researchers surveyed 329 adults online about past trauma, social standing, current perceived stress, resilience, emotion regulation, and stigma about being emotional. Statistical grouping revealed three types of people: those with low stress and high resilience, those with high current stress and low resilience, and those with high past/long-term stress and moderate resilience. People in the high current stress, low resilience group reported the poorest ability to regulate their emotions compared with the other two groups. Both higher-stress groups also reported more stigma around emotionality (negative views about showing or having emotions) than the low stress, high resilience group. This research suggests that looking at stress and resilience together, rather than separately, may help identify who is most likely to struggle with emotion-related processes linked to health. Because the sample was mostly White, non-Hispanic, and relied on self-report at a single time point, the findings may not apply to everyone and cannot show cause and effect.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Seely H, Brown S. (2026). The Role of Stress and Resilience Profiles in Emotional Health.. Journal of community psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.70161