The STRENGTH Study: A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a behaviour change intervention added to cardiac rehabilitation on physical activity adherence.
A behaviour change intervention added to standard maintenance stage cardiac rehabilitation did not improve physical activity or health outcomes, though continued access to cardiac rehabilitation sustained high physical activity levels.
Key Findings
Results
No significant differences in daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) or steps per day were observed between intervention and control groups at six months follow-up.
Primary outcome was physical activity measured with an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer
The trial was a cluster randomised controlled trial across six community-based maintenance stage cardiac rehabilitation classes
Total of 96 participants were enrolled (mean age 65.04 ± 8.38 years; 75% male)
No significant differences were found between the behaviour change intervention group and standard care group at six months
Results
No significant differences in secondary outcomes including self-rated health, quality of life, and mental wellbeing were observed between groups at six months follow-up.
Secondary outcomes assessed included self-rated health, quality of life, and mental wellbeing
Neither group showed superiority on any secondary outcome measure
Findings were consistent across all secondary outcome domains
Methods
The study was conducted as a cluster randomised controlled trial across six community-based maintenance stage cardiac rehabilitation classes.
Six clusters (community-based maintenance stage cardiac rehabilitation classes) were randomised
96 participants total were included
Participants were in the maintenance stage of cardiac rehabilitation, representing a later phase of rehabilitation
The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05705310
Discussion
High baseline physical activity levels among participants and extended cardiac rehabilitation support provided to both groups may have masked any intervention effects.
Authors attributed null findings partly to high baseline physical activity levels among participants
Both intervention and control groups received ongoing cardiac rehabilitation support throughout the study period
The extended support to both groups was identified as potentially masking intervention-specific effects
Authors noted that continued access to cardiac rehabilitation sustained high physical activity levels in both groups
Discussion
Continued access to cardiac rehabilitation sustained high physical activity levels regardless of the additional behaviour change intervention.
Both groups maintained high physical activity levels over the study period
This suggests that ongoing cardiac rehabilitation participation itself is associated with sustained physical activity
Authors recommended future research to disentangle the independent effects of behaviour interventions and ongoing cardiac rehabilitation support
Background
Coronary heart disease is identified as the leading cause of global mortality, with cardiac rehabilitation including physical activity shown to reduce related morbidity and mortality.
Coronary heart disease imposes significant health and economic burdens globally
Cardiac rehabilitation including physical activity can reduce coronary heart disease-related morbidity and mortality
The study was designed to test whether adding a behaviour change intervention to cardiac rehabilitation could promote and maintain physical activity beyond standard care timeframes
Doherty C, Tully M, Wilson J, Heron L, McAneney H, Irving V, et al.. (2026). The STRENGTH Study: A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a behaviour change intervention added to cardiac rehabilitation on physical activity adherence.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345293