Sexual Health

The waiting room: Unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024.

TL;DR

Despite high sexual health service engagement, one-in-eight men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England reported unmet need for in-person sexual health services, with disparities by geography, financial status, and health condition.

Key Findings

A substantial proportion of participants had accessed in-person sexual health services, both historically and in the past year.

  • Among 2404 participants living in England, 86% had ever accessed in-person sexual health services (SHS)
  • 59% had accessed in-person SHS in the past year
  • Median participant age was 45 years; 88% were White and 95% were cisgender
  • The survey was conducted in November/December 2024 via an online cross-sectional community survey

12% of those who tried to access in-person care in the past year experienced unmet need.

  • Unmet need was defined as having tried but failed to access a SHS in-person
  • Prevalence of unmet need was 12% (95% CI: 11%–14%) among those who attempted in-person access
  • This represents approximately one-in-eight individuals who sought in-person care
  • The survey included 2404 participants living in England

Unmet need was substantially higher outside London compared to within London.

  • Unmet need was 15% outside London versus 8% in London
  • In adjusted multivariable analysis, living in London was associated with lower odds of unmet need (aOR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.44–0.92])
  • Geographic disparity was one of the most prominent findings in the study

The most common barriers to accessing in-person SHS were appointment unavailability and inconvenient appointment times.

  • 50% of those with unmet need cited unavailable appointment times as a barrier
  • 41% cited inconvenient appointment times as a barrier
  • These scheduling-related barriers were the two most frequently reported reasons for unmet need

Financial comfort was associated with lower odds of unmet need for in-person SHS.

  • Participants who were financially comfortable had lower adjusted odds of unmet need (aOR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.49–0.97])
  • This finding persisted after adjustment in multivariable logistic regression
  • Financial discomfort thus represents a vulnerability factor associated with unmet SHS need

Participants with markers of higher sexual risk were substantially less likely to report unmet need.

  • Those reporting ≥1 marker of sexual risk had markedly lower adjusted odds of unmet need (aOR: 0.14 [95% CI: 0.10–0.20])
  • Sexual risk markers included: HIV-PrEP use in the last year and/or last 3–4 months, a bacterial STI diagnosis, engaging in chemsex, and/or having had ≥10 male physical sex partners
  • This suggests that higher-risk individuals may have better access to or prioritization within in-person SHS

Having a limiting long-term physical health condition was associated with higher odds of unmet need.

  • Participants with limiting long-term physical health conditions had higher adjusted odds of unmet need (aOR: 1.61 [95% CI: 1.12–2.30])
  • This association persisted in multivariable analysis after adjustment for other covariates
  • This finding highlights potential accessibility barriers for people with disabilities or chronic conditions

Prior use of online postal self-sampling (OPSS) services for STI testing was associated with higher odds of unmet need for in-person SHS.

  • Participants who reported ever using OPSS had higher adjusted odds of unmet need (aOR: 1.50 [95% CI: 1.07–2.09])
  • This association may reflect that individuals who use online services do so partly because they have encountered barriers to in-person care
  • OPSS use was assessed as a lifetime (ever-use) measure

Sexual health service delivery in England shifted substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic, with rapid expansion of online services, prompting concern about unmet in-person need.

  • The background notes a substantial shift in SHS delivery during COVID-19 with rapid expansion of online services
  • Limited data existed prior to this study on unmet need for in-person SHS in England
  • Men and gender-diverse individuals who have sex with men are identified as key populations disproportionately affected by sexual health inequalities
  • The RiiSH 2024 survey was designed specifically to address this evidence gap

The authors recommend local service delivery guided by joint strategic needs assessments to address unmet need.

  • Despite high overall SHS engagement, one-in-eight reported unmet need for in-person SHS
  • Geographic disparities (London vs. outside London) and socioeconomic and health-related inequalities were identified as key targets for intervention
  • The authors suggest that 'local service delivery guided by joint strategic needs assessments could help address unmet need for SHS'

What This Means

This research suggests that while most gay, bisexual, and gender-diverse men in England regularly use sexual health services, a meaningful gap exists in accessing in-person care. Using an online survey of over 2,400 people conducted in late 2024, researchers found that one in eight individuals who tried to get an in-person sexual health appointment in the past year were unable to do so. The most common reasons were that appointments simply weren't available or were offered at inconvenient times. People living outside London were nearly twice as likely to face this unmet need compared to those in London, highlighting a significant geographic inequality in service access. The study also found that people with long-term physical health conditions and those who had previously used online postal STI testing kits were more likely to have unmet in-person needs, suggesting these groups may face particular barriers to clinic-based care. Interestingly, people with higher sexual risk profiles — such as those using HIV-prevention medication (PrEP) or who had a recent STI diagnosis — were far less likely to report unmet need, possibly because they are more actively engaged with and prioritized by specialist services. Financial comfort was also linked to lower unmet need, pointing to socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare access. This research suggests that the rapid shift toward online and postal sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic, while expanding reach in some ways, has not fully replaced the need for in-person care — particularly outside major cities and for people with health conditions. The findings point to the importance of local planning and needs assessments to ensure that clinic-based services are available and accessible to those who need them most.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Ogaz D, Mullen D, Baldry G, Jayes D, Phillips D, Lowndes C, et al.. (2026). The waiting room: Unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024.. International journal of STD & AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251413004