Gut Microbiome

Transfer of faeces in ulcerative colitis 2: improving efficacy - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2 study).

TL;DR

This paper describes the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2) evaluating whether strictly anoxic-processed donor faecal microbiota transplantation is more efficacious than anoxic-processed autologous FMT in inducing steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis.

Key Findings

The TURN2 trial is designed as a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study comparing strictly anoxic-processed donor FMT versus anoxic-processed autologous FMT in active UC.

  • The study is placebo-controlled with autologous FMT serving as the control arm
  • The trial is double-blind to reduce bias
  • Multiple centres are involved to improve generalisability
  • An open-label extension option is available for non-responders in the autologous arm

The previous TURN trial found a correlation between clinical response to FMT and specific microbial strains and butyrate production, motivating the design of TURN2.

  • The original TURN trial full name was 'Transfer of Faeces in Ulcerative Colitis; Restoring Homeostasis'
  • Butyrate production was identified as a correlate of clinical response
  • Specific microbial strains were also correlated with response
  • These findings informed donor selection criteria for TURN2

Strict anoxic processing of donor stool is hypothesised to be essential for increasing FMT efficacy because most gut microbes, including many butyrate producers, are anaerobes.

  • Most gut microbes are anaerobes and may be damaged by oxygen exposure during standard processing
  • Many butyrate-producing bacteria are anaerobes
  • Anoxic processing is applied to both donor and autologous (control) FMT preparations
  • This represents a methodological refinement over prior FMT trials that lacked strict anoxic protocols

The TURN2 trial employs a repetitive dual-route administration strategy, with patients receiving four weekly FMTs combining nasoduodenal and enema routes.

  • Patients receive 4 weekly FMTs in total
  • Two of the four administrations are double-route: nasoduodenal administration combined with enema
  • Two of the four administrations are single enemas
  • This dual-route approach is intended to enhance FMT efficacy compared to single-route delivery

The primary endpoint is steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8, assessed by the adapted Mayo score, requiring 76 evaluable patients.

  • Remission is assessed at week 8 post-treatment initiation
  • The adapted Mayo score is the assessment instrument
  • A total of 76 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint will be included
  • The endpoint requires both clinical and endoscopic remission, as well as being steroid-free

Donors are selected based on their microbiota profile, informed by findings from the previous TURN trial and the existing literature.

  • Donor selection is microbiota profile-based rather than random or convenience-based
  • The selection criteria were informed by the prior TURN trial results
  • This represents a targeted donor selection strategy aimed at improving FMT efficacy
  • The specific microbial features used for donor selection are grounded in the correlation with butyrate production and response identified in TURN

An interim analysis will be conducted midway through the study by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board to monitor both efficacy and safety.

  • The interim analysis is conducted at the midpoint of recruitment
  • It is overseen by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)
  • Both efficacy and safety outcomes are monitored at interim analysis
  • This is a standard safety and efficacy monitoring mechanism for randomised controlled trials

Secondary outcomes include clinical, endoscopic, and histological response, as well as evaluation of specific microbial strains, metabolites, and mechanisms correlated with response.

  • Clinical, endoscopic, and histological response are all measured as secondary outcomes
  • Microbial strain-level analyses are planned
  • Metabolite profiling is included to understand mechanisms of response
  • The study explicitly aims to inform development of future microbial therapies

Mixed results and protocol heterogeneity across prior FMT studies in UC have limited practical application of FMT, providing the rationale for a standardised, optimised protocol in TURN2.

  • Prior FMT trials in UC have shown promise for inducing remission but with inconsistent results
  • Protocol heterogeneity is identified as a key limitation of the existing evidence base
  • TURN2 addresses this through strict anoxic processing, targeted donor selection, and a defined repetitive dual-route administration schedule
  • Ethics approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (reference number 2018_057)

What This Means

This paper describes the design and protocol for a clinical trial called TURN2, which tests whether faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) — transferring stool from a healthy donor into a patient — can help people with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) go into remission. UC is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, and research suggests that imbalances in the gut's microbial community play a role in causing it. A previous trial by the same team found that patients who responded to FMT tended to receive microbes that produced a molecule called butyrate, which has anti-inflammatory properties. Because these butyrate-producing microbes are sensitive to oxygen, TURN2 uses a careful oxygen-free ('anoxic') preparation process to keep them alive and effective. The TURN2 trial will randomly assign 76 patients to receive either donor FMT (from a carefully selected healthy donor) or autologous FMT (using the patient's own stool as a placebo). Patients will receive four weekly treatments, with some delivered through both a nasal tube into the small intestine and an enema, and others by enema alone. Donors are selected based on their microbial profiles, building on lessons from the previous trial. The main question the trial asks is whether patients achieve remission — defined as being free of steroids and having both clinical and endoscopic (camera-based) evidence of remission — at 8 weeks after starting treatment. Patients in the placebo group who do not respond will have the option to receive real donor FMT afterward. This research suggests that carefully optimising how FMT is prepared and delivered — by protecting oxygen-sensitive gut bacteria during processing, choosing donors with beneficial microbial profiles, and using multiple delivery routes repeatedly — may improve the chances of FMT working for people with UC. Beyond the clinical results, the trial will also collect detailed data on which specific microbes and their chemical products are linked to getting better, which could help develop more targeted treatments for inflammatory bowel disease in the future.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Bénard M, Van Der Spek M, Davids M, Visser C, Zoetendal E, Rethans B, et al.. (2026). Transfer of faeces in ulcerative colitis 2: improving efficacy - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2 study).. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107097