Methods
The TURN2 trial is designed as a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study comparing strictly anoxic-processed donor FMT versus anoxic-processed autologous FMT in active UC.
- The study is placebo-controlled with autologous FMT serving as the control arm
- The trial is double-blind to reduce bias
- Multiple centres are involved to improve generalisability
- An open-label extension option is available for non-responders in the autologous arm
Background
The previous TURN trial found a correlation between clinical response to FMT and specific microbial strains and butyrate production, motivating the design of TURN2.
- The original TURN trial full name was 'Transfer of Faeces in Ulcerative Colitis; Restoring Homeostasis'
- Butyrate production was identified as a correlate of clinical response
- Specific microbial strains were also correlated with response
- These findings informed donor selection criteria for TURN2
Background
Strict anoxic processing of donor stool is hypothesised to be essential for increasing FMT efficacy because most gut microbes, including many butyrate producers, are anaerobes.
- Most gut microbes are anaerobes and may be damaged by oxygen exposure during standard processing
- Many butyrate-producing bacteria are anaerobes
- Anoxic processing is applied to both donor and autologous (control) FMT preparations
- This represents a methodological refinement over prior FMT trials that lacked strict anoxic protocols
Methods
The TURN2 trial employs a repetitive dual-route administration strategy, with patients receiving four weekly FMTs combining nasoduodenal and enema routes.
- Patients receive 4 weekly FMTs in total
- Two of the four administrations are double-route: nasoduodenal administration combined with enema
- Two of the four administrations are single enemas
- This dual-route approach is intended to enhance FMT efficacy compared to single-route delivery
Methods
The primary endpoint is steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8, assessed by the adapted Mayo score, requiring 76 evaluable patients.
- Remission is assessed at week 8 post-treatment initiation
- The adapted Mayo score is the assessment instrument
- A total of 76 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint will be included
- The endpoint requires both clinical and endoscopic remission, as well as being steroid-free
Methods
Donors are selected based on their microbiota profile, informed by findings from the previous TURN trial and the existing literature.
- Donor selection is microbiota profile-based rather than random or convenience-based
- The selection criteria were informed by the prior TURN trial results
- This represents a targeted donor selection strategy aimed at improving FMT efficacy
- The specific microbial features used for donor selection are grounded in the correlation with butyrate production and response identified in TURN
Methods
An interim analysis will be conducted midway through the study by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board to monitor both efficacy and safety.
- The interim analysis is conducted at the midpoint of recruitment
- It is overseen by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)
- Both efficacy and safety outcomes are monitored at interim analysis
- This is a standard safety and efficacy monitoring mechanism for randomised controlled trials
Methods
Secondary outcomes include clinical, endoscopic, and histological response, as well as evaluation of specific microbial strains, metabolites, and mechanisms correlated with response.
- Clinical, endoscopic, and histological response are all measured as secondary outcomes
- Microbial strain-level analyses are planned
- Metabolite profiling is included to understand mechanisms of response
- The study explicitly aims to inform development of future microbial therapies
Background
Mixed results and protocol heterogeneity across prior FMT studies in UC have limited practical application of FMT, providing the rationale for a standardised, optimised protocol in TURN2.
- Prior FMT trials in UC have shown promise for inducing remission but with inconsistent results
- Protocol heterogeneity is identified as a key limitation of the existing evidence base
- TURN2 addresses this through strict anoxic processing, targeted donor selection, and a defined repetitive dual-route administration schedule
- Ethics approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (reference number 2018_057)