The C-T2-DDAS is a reliable and culturally appropriate tool for assessing diabetes-related distress in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes, demonstrating good internal consistency, strong content validity, and confirmed eight-factor structure.
Key Findings
Results
The C-T2-DDAS demonstrated good internal consistency across all scales.
Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 for the CORE scale
Internal consistency for the seven SOURCE scales ranged from 0.76 to 0.88
These values indicate good to excellent internal consistency across the instrument's components
Results
The C-T2-DDAS showed moderate test-retest reliability.
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.63
This was described as 'moderate' test-retest reliability
Test-retest reliability was assessed as part of the psychometric evaluation in Phase 2
Results
Content validity indices for the C-T2-DDAS were high.
Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI) = 1.00 for the CORE scale
S-CVI = 0.96 for the seven SOURCE scales
Content validity was established through expert panel review during the translation and cultural adaptation phase
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original eight-factor structure of the C-T2-DDAS with strong model fit.
RMSEA = 0.045, indicating close model fit
SRMR = 0.041, indicating good fit
CFI/NNFI = 1.00, indicating excellent fit
The eight-factor structure of the original T2-DDAS was preserved in the Chinese translation
Results
Convergent validity of the C-T2-DDAS was confirmed through strong correlation with the Chinese Diabetes Distress Scale.
The CORE scale correlated with the Chinese Diabetes Distress Scale at r = 0.78, p < 0.001
This strong correlation supports the convergent validity of the C-T2-DDAS
292 participants were recruited from a public hospital outpatient clinic in Hong Kong for the validation study
Methods
The translation and cultural adaptation of the T2-DDAS into Traditional Chinese followed a two-phase methodological approach.
Phase 1 involved forward and backward translation, expert panel review, and pilot testing
Phase 2 comprised a cross-sectional validation study with 292 participants
Participants were recruited from a public hospital outpatient clinic in Hong Kong
The target population was individuals with type 2 diabetes
What This Means
This research suggests that a Traditional Chinese version of a diabetes distress measurement tool — the Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS) — can be reliably used with Chinese-speaking adults who have type 2 diabetes in Hong Kong. The original tool was carefully translated and culturally adapted, then tested with 292 patients at a public hospital outpatient clinic to check whether it measured what it was supposed to measure and gave consistent results. The Chinese version (C-T2-DDAS) performed well across multiple tests of reliability and validity, including strong agreement between its results and those of an existing validated Chinese diabetes distress scale.
What makes this tool notable is its multidimensional structure: it assesses not only the core emotional distress that people with diabetes feel, but also seven specific sources of that distress. This means clinicians and researchers can identify not just whether someone is distressed, but why — for example, whether the distress stems from managing medications, relationships, or other factors. This level of detail could help healthcare providers tailor support and interventions more precisely to individual patients' needs.
This research suggests the C-T2-DDAS is a practical and culturally suitable tool for routine screening of diabetes-related psychological distress in Chinese-speaking populations. The authors note that future work should examine how well the tool tracks changes over time and whether it is applicable to broader Chinese-speaking communities beyond Hong Kong.
Ngan H, Wong C, Choi K, Loo K, Tam H. (2026). Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (C-T2-DDAS).. Primary care diabetes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2026.01.008