Flow diversion for MCA aneurysms achieves approximately 71% complete or near-complete occlusion with a 13% complication rate, findings that 'may support its consideration in carefully selected cases, though the retrospective evidence base warrants cautious interpretation.'
Key Findings
Results
The pooled complete or near-complete occlusion rate for flow diversion of MCA aneurysms was 71% at a mean follow-up of 15 months.
Analysis encompassed 33 studies and 1,036 MCA aneurysms, representing the largest cohort to date.
Pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model.
Mean follow-up duration was 15 months.
Occlusion rates did not differ significantly across MCA segments: 66% proximal, 69% bifurcation, and 70% distal.
Results
No significant differences in occlusion rates were found across MCA segments or across device types.
Proximal MCA segment occlusion rate was 66%.
Bifurcation MCA segment occlusion rate was 69%.
Distal MCA segment occlusion rate was 70%.
Subgroup analyses were performed by both aneurysm location and device type with no significant differences identified.
Results
The overall complication rate following flow diversion for MCA aneurysms was 13%, predominantly thromboembolic.
Complications were predominantly thromboembolic in nature.
Procedural mortality was 1%.
The complication rate was derived from pooled analysis of 33 studies covering 1,036 aneurysms.
Publication bias and underreporting of complications cannot be excluded, which may affect the true complication rate.
Results
Functional independence, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2, was achieved in 90% of patients following flow diversion for MCA aneurysms.
Functional independence was measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), with scores 0–2 indicating functional independence.
The 90% functional independence rate was derived from pooled analysis across 33 included studies.
Included studies were predominantly retrospective cohort series and case series.
Heterogeneity existed across studies in device type, antiplatelet regimens, follow-up duration, and outcome definitions.
Methods
The systematic review identified significant methodological heterogeneity and potential biases across the included studies.
Included studies were predominantly retrospective cohort series and case series.
Heterogeneity was noted in device type, antiplatelet regimens, follow-up duration, and outcome definitions.
Publication bias and underreporting of complications cannot be excluded.
The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with inclusion criteria requiring studies of ≥3 patients treated with flow-diverter devices.
Background
Flow diversion for MCA aneurysms remains controversial due to frequent involvement of side branches and bifurcations.
MCA aneurysms frequently involve side branches and bifurcations, complicating the use of flow-diverter devices.
Prior to this meta-analysis, outcomes had been reported only in cohort studies and case series, leaving safety and efficacy uncertain.
The authors note this study represents 'the largest cohort to date' with 1,036 aneurysms across 33 studies.
The findings 'may support its consideration in carefully selected cases.'
What This Means
This research analyzed data from 33 studies involving 1,036 brain aneurysms located in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) — a major blood vessel in the brain — that were treated with flow-diverter stents. Flow diverters are small mesh tubes placed inside the artery to redirect blood flow away from an aneurysm, causing it to clot off and seal. The study found that about 71% of MCA aneurysms achieved complete or near-complete closure over an average follow-up period of 15 months, and 90% of patients retained functional independence after treatment. The overall complication rate was 13%, mostly due to blood clots, and the procedural death rate was 1%.
One important finding was that outcomes were similar regardless of where along the MCA the aneurysm was located and regardless of which specific type of flow-diverter device was used. This suggests the technique may be broadly applicable to MCA aneurysms, which has historically been a debated topic because these aneurysms often sit near critical branching points in the brain's blood supply, making treatment more complex.
This research suggests that flow diversion is a potentially viable treatment option for MCA aneurysms in carefully selected patients, but the authors caution that the evidence base is largely retrospective (meaning it looks back at past cases rather than running a controlled experiment), and that the true complication rate may be higher than reported due to publication bias. More rigorous prospective studies would be needed to draw firmer conclusions about when this approach should be preferred over other treatments such as surgical clipping or conventional coil embolization.
Gülsuna B, Patel P, Gülsuyu B, Ibrahim S, Özaydin B, Adeeb N, et al.. (2026). Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1036 Aneurysms.. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A9188