Aging & Longevity

Typology of ageing and its associations with the end of life and death among older adults in China: a longitudinal person-centred study.

TL;DR

Four qualitatively distinctive ageing profiles emerged among deceased older adults in China, with heterogeneity revolving around functional and cognitive capacities and economic/financial characteristics, and distinct end-of-life patterns emphasizing the need for targeted care strategies.

Key Findings

Four distinct ageing profiles were identified among deceased older adults in China using latent class modelling.

  • Profiles were: healthy-and-supported (57%), cognitively-competent-but-functionally-dependent (12%), functionally-capable-but-cognitively-challenged (18%), and frail-and-support-lacking (13%).
  • Classification was based on intrinsic capacity (functional, physical, cognitive, mental and social dimensions; 20 indicators) and environment characteristics (healthcare-related, financial and social aspects; 10 items).
  • Sample included N=9755 older participants from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study (CLHLS) who died between survey waves from 2008 to 2018.
  • Profiles were primarily distinguished by functional and cognitive capacities and financial status.

Social participation was uniformly insufficient across all four ageing profiles.

  • Low social engagement was observed across all profiles regardless of functional or cognitive status.
  • This finding highlighted the need for boosting overall social participation and developing community-level social services.
  • Social participation was included as one of the dimensions of intrinsic capacity assessed via 20 indicators.

Sociodemographic factors were associated with ageing profile membership.

  • Sex, education, marital status, living arrangement, and residence location were all associated with profile membership.
  • Age was also examined as a sociodemographic correlate of profile membership.
  • These disparities were identified through analysis of the longitudinal CLHLS dataset spanning 2008–2018.

The healthy-and-supported profile was most prone to painful deaths in hospital settings.

  • The healthy-and-supported group comprised the largest share of participants at 57% of the sample.
  • Despite better quality of life in final months, this group had the highest likelihood of experiencing pain at death.
  • Hospital death was the predominant place of death for this profile.

Functionally capable participants (functionally-capable-but-cognitively-challenged profile) most often died at home.

  • This profile comprised 18% of the study sample.
  • Members of this group enjoyed a better quality of life in their final months alongside the healthy-and-supported group.
  • Home death was the most common end-of-life setting for this profile, suggesting distinct care pathway patterns compared to other groups.

The frail-and-support-lacking profile had the highest risk of terminal delirium.

  • This profile comprised 13% of the study sample.
  • Financial characteristics were particularly salient for this group in distinguishing it from other profiles.
  • The elevated delirium risk in this group underscores the importance of interventions for delirium prevention in resource-limited older adults.

The first (healthy-and-supported) and third (functionally-capable-but-cognitively-challenged) profiles had better quality of life in their final months.

  • Quality of life in the final period was assessed via functional status measured at the wave prior to death.
  • End-of-life outcomes assessed included length of survival, functional status prior to death, pain at death, and terminal delirium.
  • These two profiles contrasted with the cognitively-competent-but-functionally-dependent and frail-and-support-lacking groups in terms of end-of-life quality.

The study used a retrospective cohort design drawing on longitudinal data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study (CLHLS) spanning 2008 to 2018.

  • The analytic sample comprised N=9755 older participants who died between survey waves.
  • Ageing profiles were derived using latent class modelling.
  • Individual-based and environment-based indicators were used jointly, capturing both intrinsic capacity and living environment characteristics.
  • Intrinsic capacity covered functional, physical, cognitive, mental, and social dimensions (20 indicators); environment characteristics covered healthcare-related, financial, and social aspects (10 items).

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Li J, Song L. (2026). Typology of ageing and its associations with the end of life and death among older adults in China: a longitudinal person-centred study.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104400