Cardiovascular

Ultrashort vs Standard-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ultrashort DAPT reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events overall, although a signal of increased MACCE was observed in STEMI but not in NSTE-ACS, and bleeding reduction was greater in East Asians, while ≤1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy may increase ischemic risk.

Key Findings

Ultrashort DAPT (≤1 month) did not significantly increase the overall risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) compared to standard-duration DAPT in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

  • Analysis included 10 randomized controlled trials with a total of 29,232 patients.
  • HR for MACCE: 1.06 (95% CI: 0.93–1.20; P = 0.38; I² = 24%).
  • Trials were identified through systematic review up to February 15, 2026.
  • Heterogeneity was low (I² = 24%), suggesting consistent results across trials.

Ultrashort DAPT significantly reduced major bleeding risk compared to standard-duration DAPT.

  • HR for major bleeding: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35–0.64; P < 0.00001; I² = 44%).
  • This represents a 53% relative reduction in major bleeding events.
  • Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I² = 44%).
  • The bleeding reduction was statistically highly significant (P < 0.00001).

Ultrashort DAPT resulted in a net clinical benefit (NACE) compared to standard-duration DAPT.

  • HR for NACE: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72–0.97; P = 0.02; I² = 61%).
  • Despite substantial heterogeneity (I² = 61%), the net clinical benefit remained statistically significant.
  • NACE combines ischemic and bleeding outcomes into a single composite endpoint.

Bleeding reduction with ultrashort DAPT was significantly more pronounced in East Asian patients than in non-East Asian patients.

  • HR for major bleeding in East Asians: 0.35 (95% CI: 0.25–0.49; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%).
  • HR for major bleeding in non-East Asians: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.43–0.93; P = 0.02; I² = 44%).
  • Interaction P-value for ethnicity subgroup = 0.02, indicating a statistically significant difference between groups.
  • East Asian trials showed no heterogeneity (I² = 0%) while non-East Asian trials showed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 44%).

The DAPT abbreviation strategy significantly modified MACCE outcomes, with intensive abbreviation increasing ischemic risk while moderate abbreviation did not.

  • P for interaction between abbreviation strategies = 0.003.
  • Intensive abbreviation (≤1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy): HR 1.37 (95% CI: 1.11–1.69; P = 0.003; I² = 0%).
  • Moderate abbreviation (≥2-week DAPT followed by ticagrelor/prasugrel monotherapy): HR 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85–1.08; P = 0.47; I² = 0%).
  • Both subgroups showed no heterogeneity (I² = 0%).

Ultrashort DAPT was associated with a higher MACCE risk in STEMI patients but not in non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients.

  • A signal of increased MACCE was observed specifically in the STEMI subgroup.
  • No statistically significant increase in MACCE was found in NSTE-ACS patients.
  • This finding suggests that ACS subtype may be an important modifier of ultrashort DAPT safety.
  • These results were from prespecified subgroup analyses.

The meta-analysis was conducted as a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing ultrashort (≤1-month) DAPT followed by antiplatelet monotherapy versus standard-duration DAPT in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

  • Literature search was conducted until February 15, 2026.
  • 10 randomized controlled trials were included with a combined sample of 29,232 patients.
  • Primary outcomes were MACCE, major bleeding, and NACE.
  • Prespecified subgroup analyses examined ethnicity (East Asian vs. non-East Asian) and abbreviation strategy (intensive vs. moderate).

What This Means

This research suggests that for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who receive a stent procedure (PCI), stopping dual antiplatelet therapy (taking two blood-thinning medications together) after one month or less—rather than continuing for the standard 12 months—does not significantly raise the risk of heart attacks, strokes, or death overall. More importantly, this shorter approach cut the risk of serious bleeding roughly in half. When combining both the bleeding benefits and the ischemic risks, patients on the shorter regimen had better overall outcomes. However, not all patients appear to benefit equally: people who had a complete heart attack (STEMI) showed a signal of higher cardiovascular event risk, while those with less severe forms of ACS (NSTE-ACS) did not. This research also suggests that how the short therapy is implemented matters greatly. Stopping both medications within one week, or switching to weaker single-drug therapy (aspirin or clopidogrel alone), appeared to raise the risk of heart events. By contrast, continuing two medications for at least two weeks before transitioning to a stronger single agent (ticagrelor or prasugrel) did not increase cardiovascular risk. Additionally, patients of East Asian ethnicity experienced a much greater reduction in bleeding compared to non-East Asian patients, pointing to potentially important biological or clinical differences between populations. Overall, this study suggests that a carefully chosen short course of dual antiplatelet therapy may be a reasonable strategy for many ACS patients, particularly those at higher bleeding risk or of East Asian ethnicity, but that the specific drugs used, duration, and patient type all matter for whether the approach is safe and beneficial. These findings may help guide more individualized treatment decisions for patients after coronary stent procedures.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Hendrianus H, Gorog D, Tantry U, Navarese E, Lee S, Cho J, et al.. (2026). Ultrashort vs Standard-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2026.07.012