In a cohort study of 19,080 patients, decentralization of cardiac rehabilitation to primary care settings was associated with increased uptake and significant reductions in geographic and social inequalities.
Key Findings
Results
Decentralization of cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced median travel distance from patients' homes to the nearest CR facility.
Median travel distance was reduced from 15.1 km (IQR, 5.9–25.7 km) before decentralization to 7.2 km (IQR, 2.8–14.8 km) after decentralization.
The study covered 21 Danish municipalities over the period 2013 to 2022.
Patients were identified through the Danish National Patient Register.
Results
Overall uptake of cardiac rehabilitation increased by 16% following decentralization.
Uptake was defined as attending at least 1 training session within 180 days from hospital discharge.
Risk ratio (RR) for uptake after vs. before decentralization was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.12–1.19).
Analysis used modified Poisson regression with adjustment for relevant covariates.
The study included 19,080 patients after excluding 295 with missing covariate data from an eligible pool of 19,375.
Results
Among patients with the longest travel distances, CR uptake increased by 45% following decentralization, and geographic inequality was significantly reduced.
This finding applied to the 20% of patients with the longest travel distances.
RR for this subgroup was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.33–1.58).
Geographic inequality was described as 'significantly reduced' following decentralization.
Travel distance from home to nearest CR facility was a primary exposure variable.
Results
Among patients with short education, CR uptake increased by 27% following decentralization, and social inequality was significantly reduced.
Educational level was a primary exposure variable in the study.
RR for uptake among patients with short education was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.20–1.35).
Social inequality in CR uptake was described as 'significantly reduced' after decentralization.
This finding suggests decentralization differentially benefited lower-educated patient groups.
Methods
The study population was predominantly male and aged 60 to 79 years, drawn from patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting.
13,355 of 19,080 included patients (70.0%) were male.
10,868 of 19,080 patients (57.0%) were aged 60 to 79 years.
Patients were required to be aged 30 years or older and discharged alive.
Patients with a previous diagnosis or procedure, or who did not reside within the study area, were excluded.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that decentralized delivery of cardiac rehabilitation is a feasible and equitable model, while emphasizing the need for ongoing monitoring of quality and safety.
The study is described as a 'register-based cohort study' using population-level Danish data.
The authors state the findings 'support decentralized delivery of CR as a feasible and equitable model.'
The authors note that 'ongoing monitoring of quality and safety remains essential.'
Data analysis was performed from April to August 2025.
What This Means
This research suggests that moving cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs from centralized hospitals to local, community-based settings—a process called decentralization—can meaningfully increase the number of heart patients who actually participate in these programs. The study followed over 19,000 Danish patients who had experienced a heart attack or undergone a heart procedure between 2013 and 2022. After decentralization, the average distance patients needed to travel to reach a CR facility was cut roughly in half (from about 15 km to about 7 km), and overall participation in at least one rehabilitation session rose by 16%.
Importantly, the benefits were greatest for patients who had previously faced the largest barriers. Patients who lived farthest from CR facilities saw a 45% increase in participation, and the gap in participation rates between those living near and far from facilities shrank significantly. Similarly, patients with lower levels of education—a group that historically participates in CR at lower rates—saw a 27% increase in uptake, and the participation gap between more- and less-educated patients was meaningfully reduced. These findings suggest that decentralization helped address both geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation.
This research matters because cardiac rehabilitation is known to improve outcomes for heart patients, yet many people who could benefit never participate. Transportation difficulties, long travel distances, and social disadvantage have long been recognized as barriers. This study provides evidence that bringing these programs closer to where people live can help overcome those barriers, particularly for the groups most likely to miss out. The authors note, however, that as these programs expand into community settings, it will be important to continue monitoring whether the quality and safety of care are maintained.
Bihrmann K, Ersbøll A, Svendsen M, Søndergaard H, Zwisler A. (2026). Uptake and Inequalities in Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation After Decentralization.. JAMA network open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39054