Cardiovascular

Usability Evaluation of a Macular Quantitative Square Grid Self-Examination Application in Patients With Macular Disease: Mixed Methods Study.

TL;DR

The GridMacuScan application demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity comparable to that of the traditional Amsler grid and received high user ratings for usability, with a mean SUS score of 82.1 indicating 'good-excellent' usability.

Key Findings

The GridMacuScan application achieved 100% diagnostic concordance with the traditional Amsler grid.

  • All eyes that showed distortion on the Amsler grid also produced positive distortion maps on the GridMacuScan application.
  • This yielded 100% diagnostic concordance between the two methods.
  • The study population consisted of 24 adults with neovascular age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema accompanied by self-reported metamorphopsia.

The GridMacuScan application received a mean System Usability Scale score indicating 'good-excellent' usability.

  • The mean SUS score was 82.1 (SD 8.7).
  • A 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to assess usability.
  • All 24 participants completed both the GridMacuScan application self-assessment and the SUS questionnaire.
  • The SUS score of 82.1 was interpreted as indicating 'good-excellent' usability.

Inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews yielded four overarching themes regarding user experience with the GridMacuScan application.

  • Eleven participants completed semistructured interviews, with data saturation achieved at that point.
  • The four themes identified were: (1) high usability and positive overall experience, (2) perceived functional advantages, (3) shortcomings and optimization suggestions, and (4) strong willingness for continued use.
  • Qualitative feedback was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

The GridMacuScan application uses a 3-step touch interface to quantify three aspects of macular distortion.

  • The application quantifies (1) distortion severity, (2) distortion area, and (3) temporal trends.
  • The application is described as a semiquantitative, touch-based self-monitoring application for macular function.
  • The study used a convergent mixed methods design with a single supervised test session.

The study enrolled 24 adults with macular disease who participated in a single supervised test session.

  • Participants had neovascular age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema.
  • All participants had self-reported metamorphopsia.
  • The study used a convergent mixed methods design combining quantitative SUS scoring and qualitative semistructured interviews.
  • Quantitative data were summarized descriptively, and qualitative feedback underwent inductive thematic analysis.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Li S, Zhang E, Pan J, Xu Y, Zheng K, Xu X, et al.. (2026). Usability Evaluation of a Macular Quantitative Square Grid Self-Examination Application in Patients With Macular Disease: Mixed Methods Study.. JMIR human factors. https://doi.org/10.2196/79699