The GridMacuScan application demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity comparable to that of the traditional Amsler grid and received high user ratings for usability, with a mean SUS score of 82.1 indicating 'good-excellent' usability.
Key Findings
Results
The GridMacuScan application achieved 100% diagnostic concordance with the traditional Amsler grid.
All eyes that showed distortion on the Amsler grid also produced positive distortion maps on the GridMacuScan application.
This yielded 100% diagnostic concordance between the two methods.
The study population consisted of 24 adults with neovascular age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema accompanied by self-reported metamorphopsia.
Results
The GridMacuScan application received a mean System Usability Scale score indicating 'good-excellent' usability.
The mean SUS score was 82.1 (SD 8.7).
A 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to assess usability.
All 24 participants completed both the GridMacuScan application self-assessment and the SUS questionnaire.
The SUS score of 82.1 was interpreted as indicating 'good-excellent' usability.
Results
Inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews yielded four overarching themes regarding user experience with the GridMacuScan application.
Eleven participants completed semistructured interviews, with data saturation achieved at that point.
The four themes identified were: (1) high usability and positive overall experience, (2) perceived functional advantages, (3) shortcomings and optimization suggestions, and (4) strong willingness for continued use.
Qualitative feedback was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Methods
The GridMacuScan application uses a 3-step touch interface to quantify three aspects of macular distortion.
The application quantifies (1) distortion severity, (2) distortion area, and (3) temporal trends.
The application is described as a semiquantitative, touch-based self-monitoring application for macular function.
The study used a convergent mixed methods design with a single supervised test session.
Methods
The study enrolled 24 adults with macular disease who participated in a single supervised test session.
Participants had neovascular age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema.
All participants had self-reported metamorphopsia.
The study used a convergent mixed methods design combining quantitative SUS scoring and qualitative semistructured interviews.
Quantitative data were summarized descriptively, and qualitative feedback underwent inductive thematic analysis.
Li S, Zhang E, Pan J, Xu Y, Zheng K, Xu X, et al.. (2026). Usability Evaluation of a Macular Quantitative Square Grid Self-Examination Application in Patients With Macular Disease: Mixed Methods Study.. JMIR human factors. https://doi.org/10.2196/79699