The (S)WEMWBS appear to be valid and reliable positive mental health measures for Canadian adults and could be regularly included in health surveys to support the surveillance of population-level changes in positive mental health.
Key Findings
Results
The WEMWBS and SWEMWBS showed no floor effects and minimal ceiling effects in the Canadian adult population.
Data were drawn from the 2024 Canadian Community Health Survey - Rapid Response on Sleep Quality and Positive Mental Health
Sample included adults 18 years and older living in the provinces
Cross-sectional study design was used
Score distributions were described as relatively normal
Results
A bifactor ESEM model for the WEMWBS and bifactor CFA model for the SWEMWBS provided the best fit to the data, with indices suggesting essential unidimensionality.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) were conducted to assess factorial validity
The bifactor models outperformed alternative factorial structures
Fit indices supported the interpretation of both scales as essentially unidimensional
Essential unidimensionality supports the use of a single total score for each scale
Results
Measurement invariance of the (S)WEMWBS was supported across gender and age groups.
Measurement invariance testing was conducted across both gender and age
Evidence for invariance indicates the scales measure the same construct comparably across these demographic subgroups
This supports valid group comparisons of (S)WEMWBS scores by gender and age
Results
Older adults had higher (S)WEMWBS scores on average, and men had higher scores than other gender groups on the WEMWBS.
Age-related differences in positive mental health scores were observed, with older adults scoring higher
Gender differences were observed on the WEMWBS, with men scoring higher on average
The gender difference was specifically noted for the WEMWBS, not explicitly stated for the SWEMWBS in the abstract
Results
The (S)WEMWBS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and were associated with other mental health indicators.
Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha
Cronbach's alphas were described as acceptable for both scales
Associations with other mental health indicators provided evidence of convergent validity
These findings support the reliability and construct validity of the scales in a Canadian context
Capaldi C, Varin M, Ooi L. (2026). Validating the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale for the positive mental health surveillance of adults in Canada.. Health reports. https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202600300002-eng