Exercise & Training

Validity of Stryd Running Power for Estimating Metabolic Demand During Incline Treadmill Running.

TL;DR

Although Stryd slightly underestimated metabolic power (~2%-4%) at steeper inclines, running at a fixed Stryd power yielded relatively consistent indications of metabolic demand across incline conditions, suggesting it is a useful metric to guide training during incline treadmill running.

Key Findings

Metabolic power and oxygen uptake were significantly higher at 6% and 8% inclines compared to 0% incline when running at a fixed Stryd power target.

  • Metabolic power at 6% incline was 1063 (191) W and at 8% was 1079 (219) W, both significantly higher than 0% incline (1037 [191] W; P < .05 for all comparisons).
  • Oxygen uptake at 6% incline was 3.02 (0.53) L/min and at 8% was 3.05 (0.62) L/min, compared to 2.95 (0.53) L/min at 0% incline.
  • Metabolic power and oxygen uptake at 2% and 4% inclines were not significantly different from 0% incline (P > .05).
  • Ten trained runners (4 females, 28 [8] y, VO2max 55.9 [9.1] mL/kg/min) performed 5-minute running trials at each incline condition.

Mechanical efficiency was significantly lower at 6% and 8% inclines compared to 0% incline.

  • Mechanical efficiency at 6% incline was 21.6% (1.4%), significantly lower than 0% incline 22.1% (1.3%); P = .024.
  • Mechanical efficiency at 8% incline was 21.3% (1.3%), significantly lower than 0% incline; P = .006.
  • Mechanical efficiency at 2% and 4% inclines was not significantly different from 0% incline (P > .05).
  • Stryd was estimated to underestimate metabolic power by approximately 2%–4% at steeper inclines.

Ventilation, breathing frequency, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion did not differ significantly across incline conditions when running at a fixed Stryd power.

  • Ventilation was not different across inclines (P = .550).
  • Breathing frequency was not different across inclines (P = .273).
  • Heart rate was not different across inclines (P = .924).
  • Rating of perceived exertion was not different across inclines (P = .709).

The study used a Step-Ramp-Step exercise test to individually calibrate running intensity targets based on the respiratory compensation point.

  • Participants performed a Step-Ramp-Step exercise test on a separate visit to estimate the running power at the respiratory compensation point.
  • Treadmill speed was adjusted at each incline condition to elicit a running power 10% below the respiratory compensation point.
  • Incline conditions of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% were performed in a random order.
  • Metabolic power and mechanical efficiency were calculated from the final minute of each 5-minute trial.

Stryd running power is a useful metric to guide training during incline treadmill running despite slight underestimation of metabolic power at steeper grades.

  • Stryd slightly underestimated metabolic power by approximately 2%–4% at steeper inclines (6% and 8%).
  • Running at a fixed Stryd power yielded 'relatively consistent indications of metabolic demand across incline conditions.'
  • The consistency of perceptual and physiological responses (heart rate, RPE, ventilation) across inclines supports the practical utility of the Stryd device for training intensity guidance.
  • The study population consisted of trained runners with a mean VO2max of 55.9 (9.1) mL/kg/min.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

van Rassel C, Gow S, Watanabe T, Ja&#xe9;n-Carrillo D, MacInnis M. (2026). Validity of Stryd Running Power for Estimating Metabolic Demand During Incline Treadmill Running.. International journal of sports physiology and performance. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0382