Although Stryd slightly underestimated metabolic power (~2%-4%) at steeper inclines, running at a fixed Stryd power yielded relatively consistent indications of metabolic demand across incline conditions, suggesting it is a useful metric to guide training during incline treadmill running.
Key Findings
Results
Metabolic power and oxygen uptake were significantly higher at 6% and 8% inclines compared to 0% incline when running at a fixed Stryd power target.
Metabolic power at 6% incline was 1063 (191) W and at 8% was 1079 (219) W, both significantly higher than 0% incline (1037 [191] W; P < .05 for all comparisons).
Oxygen uptake at 6% incline was 3.02 (0.53) L/min and at 8% was 3.05 (0.62) L/min, compared to 2.95 (0.53) L/min at 0% incline.
Metabolic power and oxygen uptake at 2% and 4% inclines were not significantly different from 0% incline (P > .05).
Ten trained runners (4 females, 28 [8] y, VO2max 55.9 [9.1] mL/kg/min) performed 5-minute running trials at each incline condition.
Results
Mechanical efficiency was significantly lower at 6% and 8% inclines compared to 0% incline.
Mechanical efficiency at 6% incline was 21.6% (1.4%), significantly lower than 0% incline 22.1% (1.3%); P = .024.
Mechanical efficiency at 8% incline was 21.3% (1.3%), significantly lower than 0% incline; P = .006.
Mechanical efficiency at 2% and 4% inclines was not significantly different from 0% incline (P > .05).
Stryd was estimated to underestimate metabolic power by approximately 2%–4% at steeper inclines.
Results
Ventilation, breathing frequency, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion did not differ significantly across incline conditions when running at a fixed Stryd power.
Ventilation was not different across inclines (P = .550).
Breathing frequency was not different across inclines (P = .273).
Heart rate was not different across inclines (P = .924).
Rating of perceived exertion was not different across inclines (P = .709).
Methods
The study used a Step-Ramp-Step exercise test to individually calibrate running intensity targets based on the respiratory compensation point.
Participants performed a Step-Ramp-Step exercise test on a separate visit to estimate the running power at the respiratory compensation point.
Treadmill speed was adjusted at each incline condition to elicit a running power 10% below the respiratory compensation point.
Incline conditions of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% were performed in a random order.
Metabolic power and mechanical efficiency were calculated from the final minute of each 5-minute trial.
Conclusions
Stryd running power is a useful metric to guide training during incline treadmill running despite slight underestimation of metabolic power at steeper grades.
Stryd slightly underestimated metabolic power by approximately 2%–4% at steeper inclines (6% and 8%).
Running at a fixed Stryd power yielded 'relatively consistent indications of metabolic demand across incline conditions.'
The consistency of perceptual and physiological responses (heart rate, RPE, ventilation) across inclines supports the practical utility of the Stryd device for training intensity guidance.
The study population consisted of trained runners with a mean VO2max of 55.9 (9.1) mL/kg/min.
van Rassel C, Gow S, Watanabe T, Jaén-Carrillo D, MacInnis M. (2026). Validity of Stryd Running Power for Estimating Metabolic Demand During Incline Treadmill Running.. International journal of sports physiology and performance. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0382