Cardiovascular

Valvular heart failure is a distinct heart transplant phenotype with comparable adjusted survival to other heart failure etiologies.

TL;DR

Valvular heart failure represents a distinct but transplantable phenotype with a 23% higher rate of waitlist death/too sick to transplant compared to non-VHF, but post-transplant survival is comparable to non-VHF recipients, and allocation framework revisions attenuated the waitlist mortality difference.

Key Findings

VHF patients had a 23% higher rate of waitlist death or becoming too sick to transplant compared to non-VHF patients.

  • Waitlist death/too sick to transplant was the primary outcome measure.
  • Sub-hazard ratio (SHR) of 1.233 for VHF diagnosis (P = 0.005).
  • VHF diagnosis was not independently associated with transplantation rates (SHR 0.979, P = 0.749).
  • This difference was attenuated following post-2018 allocation guideline changes in subgroup analysis.

Post-transplant survival was not significantly different between VHF and non-VHF recipients.

  • P = 0.812 for the comparison of post-transplant survival between groups.
  • Independent predictors of mortality were patient-level risk factors rather than VHF diagnosis itself.
  • This finding held in the overall cohort and was examined in the post-2018 allocation era subgroup.

VHF recipients had a distinct demographic and clinical phenotype compared to non-VHF recipients at the time of listing.

  • VHF recipients were older (55.3 vs 54.0 years, P = 0.004).
  • VHF recipients were more frequently female (36.1% vs 25.0%, P < 0.001).
  • VHF recipients had higher rates of prior cardiac surgery (P < 0.001).
  • VHF recipients had greater pulmonary vascular burden.
  • Data were drawn from the UNOS thoracic transplant database including adult, first-time, heart-only listings.

VHF recipients had higher ECMO use and lower VAD use at the time of listing compared to non-VHF recipients.

  • ECMO rates were higher in VHF recipients (4.9% vs 2.5%, P < 0.001).
  • VAD use was lower in VHF recipients (17.3% vs 31.7%, P < 0.001).
  • This difference in mechanical support strategy reflects a distinct clinical profile for VHF patients.

Post-2018 allocation era changes attenuated the waitlist mortality difference between VHF and non-VHF patients.

  • A subgroup analysis was performed specifically in the post-2018 allocation era.
  • The waitlist mortality difference observed in the overall cohort was attenuated following guideline changes.
  • VHF accounts for 1–5% of heart transplant listings, making this a relatively rare but clinically important group.

The study used a retrospective cohort design drawing from the UNOS thoracic transplant database.

  • The database included adult, first-time, heart-only listings with a diagnosis of heart disease.
  • Patients were grouped by diagnosis as VHF or non-VHF.
  • Primary outcome was waitlist events; post-transplant survival and outcomes were secondary analyses.
  • Subgroup analysis was performed in the post-2018 allocation era.

What This Means

This research suggests that patients with heart failure caused by valvular heart disease (problems with the heart's valves) represent a distinct group among those awaiting heart transplants. Compared to patients with other causes of heart failure, those with valvular heart failure were older, more often female, more likely to have had prior heart surgery, and had more strain on their lung blood vessels. They were also more likely to be on a heart-lung bypass machine (ECMO) and less likely to have a ventricular assist device (VAD) while waiting for a transplant. Importantly, valvular heart failure patients faced a 23% higher risk of dying or becoming too sick to receive a transplant while on the waitlist, but once they received a transplant, their survival was just as good as patients with other types of heart failure. This research also suggests that changes made to the heart transplant allocation system in 2018 helped reduce the gap in waitlist mortality between valvular and non-valvular heart failure patients. The factors that predicted worse outcomes after transplant were related to individual patient characteristics rather than the valvular diagnosis itself, pointing to the importance of referring these patients early and optimizing their health before transplant. The practical implication of these findings is that valvular heart failure should not be seen as a barrier to heart transplantation — outcomes after transplant are comparable to other heart failure types. However, the higher risk of dying or deteriorating while waiting for a transplant highlights the need for early identification and referral of these patients, so they can be listed and managed before their condition becomes too severe for transplantation.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Kelley D, Kathawate V, Ho J, Belec A, Tashima T, Ueno K, et al.. (2026). Valvular heart failure is a distinct heart transplant phenotype with comparable adjusted survival to other heart failure etiologies.. International journal of cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2026.134747