Mental Health

Viewing art as a pathway to psychological well-being and physical health.

TL;DR

Viewing art in a museum led to greater subjective well-being and lower stress compared to neutral or pleasant control activities, but heart rate and cortisol changes did not differ by condition, suggesting potential for museum-based mental health interventions but inconclusive evidence for physical health benefits.

Key Findings

Viewing art in a museum led to greater subjective well-being compared to neutral and pleasant control activities.

  • Participants were randomly assigned to visit a museum exhibit, a neutral activity, or another pleasant activity.
  • Subjective well-being was measured via self-report ratings.
  • The art-viewing condition produced higher well-being scores than both comparison conditions.
  • The study used an experimental manipulation of exposure to art within a museum context.

Viewing art in a museum led to lower self-reported stress compared to neutral and pleasant control activities.

  • Participants rated their subjective stress as part of the mental health assessment.
  • The art-viewing condition showed lower stress ratings than both the neutral and the other pleasant activity conditions.
  • Stress benefits were particularly pronounced for participants who began the study with high levels of stress.
  • The stress reduction effect was assessed via self-report measures rather than exclusively physiological markers.

Stress reduction benefits from viewing art were especially pronounced for individuals who entered the study with high baseline stress levels.

  • Baseline stress was assessed before the activity conditions were administered.
  • The moderation by baseline stress suggests a potential therapeutic relevance for higher-stress populations.
  • This pattern was identified within the same experimental manipulation comparing art viewing to neutral and pleasant control conditions.

Heart rate did not differ significantly between the art-viewing condition and control conditions.

  • Heart rate was measured during the activities as an index of physical health.
  • No significant differences in heart rate were observed across the art-viewing, neutral, and pleasant activity conditions.
  • This finding was described as 'inconclusive concerning physical health.'

Salivary cortisol changes did not differ significantly between the art-viewing condition and control conditions.

  • Salivary cortisol was collected before and after each activity as a physiological measure of stress and physical health.
  • Pre-to-post cortisol changes did not differ by condition.
  • The null cortisol finding, together with the null heart rate finding, led authors to conclude results were 'inconclusive concerning physical health.'

The study design involved comparing a museum art-viewing experience to both a neutral activity and another pleasant activity as control conditions.

  • Including a pleasant activity control allowed the authors to isolate effects specific to art viewing beyond general positive affect from any enjoyable activity.
  • Physical health was assessed via heart rate during activities and salivary cortisol before and after.
  • Mental health was assessed via self-reported subjective well-being and stress.
  • The activity duration involved approximately one hour of exposure.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Stellar J, Priewe S, Lidhar N, Martin L. (2026). Viewing art as a pathway to psychological well-being and physical health.. Applied psychology. Health and well-being. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70131